PARIS, June 28: FIFA’s Executive Committee has rejected a proposal to expand the 2006 World Cup finals to 36 teams, but to do so backtracked on its promise to give Oceania an automatic place in the tournament.

The South American confederation CONMEBOL had proposed the increase from the current 32 teams after its allocation was reduced by “half a slot” - a place in a playoff - to give Oceania an automatic finals place.

However, to placate the South Americans FIFA agreed on Saturday to return their half-place at the expense of Oceania, a decision that led to the furious Oceania delegation storming out of the meeting.

FIFA initially gave the CONMEBOL proposal a guarded welcome but, after a detailed investigation of the logistical problems of increasing the numbers, it was voted out by a majority of 23-1 - Oceania being the only dissenting voice.

However, with South America having lost a further qualifying place for the 2006 tournament in Germany after FIFA ruled last year that the defending champions, Brazil, would not get automatic qualification, FIFA officials were anxious to please them.

“We have to find a solution to make them (CONMEBOL) happy again but in this case everybody was unanimous,” UEFA President Lennart Johansson said.

Johansson said the reason for the U-turn on Oceania’s qualifying position was playing standards.

“CONMEBOL also have a standard on the pitch,” he said. “They lost the winner (Brazil) and then another half-place.

“If you make a mistake you must correct it,” he said. “It was too early to give them (Oceania) direct entry to the World Cup but it doesn’t mean we stay with this for the future.”

Australia have been the dominant force in Oceania recently, but have failed to reach the finals after losing playoffs to Argentina, Uruguay, Scotland and Iran.

Nicolas Leoz, the Paraguayan president of CONMEBOL, welcomed the decision.

“It was virtually a full majority,” he said. “There were 24 votes and only one was against.”

Colombian member Oscar Astudillo said: “South America has recovered what belonged to it and was taken away in December.

“We now have 4.5 places and that is as it should be. I am very happy we have got back what was ours.”—Reuters

Opinion

Who bears the cost?

Who bears the cost?

This small window of low inflation should compel a rethink of how the authorities and employers understand the average household’s

Editorial

Internet restrictions
Updated 23 Dec, 2024

Internet restrictions

Notion that Pakistan enjoys unprecedented freedom of expression difficult to reconcile with the reality of restrictions.
Bangladesh reset
23 Dec, 2024

Bangladesh reset

THE vibes were positive during Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif’s recent meeting with Bangladesh interim leader Dr...
Leaving home
23 Dec, 2024

Leaving home

FROM asylum seekers to economic migrants, the continuing exodus from Pakistan shows mass disillusionment with the...
Military convictions
Updated 22 Dec, 2024

Military convictions

Pakistan’s democracy, still finding its feet, cannot afford such compromises on core democratic values.
Need for talks
22 Dec, 2024

Need for talks

FOR a long time now, the country has been in the grip of relentless political uncertainty, featuring the...
Vulnerable vaccinators
22 Dec, 2024

Vulnerable vaccinators

THE campaign to eradicate polio from Pakistan cannot succeed unless the safety of vaccinators and security personnel...