Low Graphics Site
White bar
.: Latest News :. .: News in Pictures :.
Dawn e-paper
Daily SectionMarker

Misc SectionMarker

Weekly SectionMarker

Weekly SectionMarker



Pakistan's Internet Magazine
Herald
Dawn GroupMarker

Archive, Search, Feedback & HelpMarker

Weather

FrontPage National International Local Business KSE Forex Sports Editorial Opinion Letters Features Today's Cartoon TV Guide Cowasjee Ayaz Irfan Hussain Review Dawn Magazine Young World Images Dawn Group Subscription To Advertise

DINA
Previous Story DAWN - the Internet Edition Next Story

July 21, 2006 Friday Jumadi-ul-Sani 24, 1427


KARACHI: Mengal moves SHC against trial by ATC



By Our Staff Reporter


KARACHI, July 20: The Sindh High Court issued the advocate-general a notice on Thursday in a petition moved by former Balochistan chief minister Sardar Akhtar Mengal and his four employees against their trial by an anti-terrorism court.

Mr Mengal, who is president of the Balochistan National Party, and his four employees, Nasrullah Mengal, Ghulam Hyder Langah alias Chappar, Mehboob Ali Satti and Ghulam Qadir, are being tried by an anti-terrorism court of Karachi for kidnapping with intent to kill army havildar Qurban Hussain and lance naik Fayaz Ahmed in Darakhshan, Clifton, on April 5.

According to havildar Qurban Hussain, the complainant in the case, he and lance naik Fayaz were on their way to discharge their intelligence duty when they were abducted by the five accused. Later, they were taken to Sardar Mengal’s residence in Khyaban-i-Shamsher, Defence Housing Authority, and were kept as hostages there. They were also tortured by their kidnappers, according to the complainant and the prosecution.

The accused moved an application before the trial anti-terrorism court for transfer of the case to a sessions court as it did not fall within the purview of the Anti-Terrorist Act. The trial court dismissed the application and proceeded to try the case. It declared Sardar Mengal an absconder in the case.

After dismissal of their plea, they approached the high court for transfer of the trial. Their counsel, Azizullah K. Shaikh, argued before a division bench comprising Justices Maqbool Baqar and Munib Ahmed Khan that the case made out against the applicants did not attract the provisions of the ATA and that it should be transferred to a sessions court.



Click to learn more...
Please Visit our Sponsor (Ads open in separate window)

Previous Story Top of Page Next Story

Seprater
Contributions
Privacy Policy
© DAWN Group of Newspapers, 2006