Not radically different
BY and large, I agree with Tasneem Noorani’s observations (‘Primacy of law in India’, Feb 16) he brought back from India. Yes, India and its people have evolved in the 60 years since independence, no question about that.
Yet, before readers get a somewhat skewed impression of some aspects of life in India, let me just say that several of Mr Noorani’s impressions are region-specific, i.e., what applies to Mumbai may not necessarily apply to New Delhi. The differences in sub-cultures may be anywhere on the subtle to jarring spectrum.
Western India, of which Mumbai is a key metropolis, has traditionally demonstrated way greater civic sense than people in north India; New Delhi represents the typical north Indian (and I suspect not radically different from behavioural patterns seen across Pakistan) culture that believes in noise; indiscipline on the roads (but maybe not as much indecent gawking at women); use of clout; ostentatiousness and so forth.
That said, there is not much to comment on his observations in respect of the law and women. But, it wasn’t always like that — impressions from 20 years back would have made for a very different copy. Like I said, yes, India has evolved but needs doing more.
MADHU LALL
Toronto, Canada

