Ministers disown Arbab’s remarks

Published
0

ISLAMABAD, March 11: The government on Sunday said that details of the presidential reference were not known to anyone as long as the same came up for the Supreme Judicial Council (SJC) hearing and whatever remarks about Justice Iftikhar Mohammad Chaudhry were coming in the press did not necessarily make part of the said reference.

Speaking at a joint news conference at the PML house, Information Minister Mohammad Ali Durrani and PML secretary-general Senator Mushahid Hussain pointed out that whatever Sindh Chief Minister Arbab Rahim or anyone else had said in the press was not considered as essential portion of the presidential reference.

In reply to a question regarding wish of the chief justice to make his trial open in the SJC, Mr Durrani said: "The trial will strictly be held in accordance with the course already determined in the Constitution."

About lawyer organisations’ threat to stage a sit-in outside the premises where the SJC will hold trial of Justice Chaudhry, the minister said: "All such lawyers, who were challenging the writ of law, should have surrendered their membership of bars before taking such an extreme step.”

When asked while Justice Chaudhry was kept in confinement and was not allowed to give his version before the press, different government functionaries were giving statements in defence of the reference, both Mr Mushahid and Mr Durrani said: "They are only clarifying the facts agitated by the opposition and have refrained so far from giving personal comments.”

They also rejected an allegation that the government had deliberately started a confrontation with the judiciary to undermine judicial activism and said: "There is neither crisis nor any confrontation but a constitutional and legal process set in motion to take its legal course."

When asked how could the SJC hold proceedings while newspaper reports say the notification of formal constitution of the said body had taken place after the filing of reference, Mr Durrani said: "This body is in existence in accordance with the constitutional provisions and the whole proceedings were being carried out within the provisions of the original 1973 Constitution."

Asked why the CJ was confined to his residence and was not allowed to meet anyone at his own will, the minister said that Justice Chaudhry was a judge and he was not expected to be a politician.

He said that a number of dignitaries, including Air Marshal (retd) Asghar Khan, had met Justice Chaudhry and many more would hold meetings with him in due course of time.

He clarified that the CJ’s meeting with President Musharraf was prescheduled and added that it was held at President’s Rawalpindi camp office and not the Army House.

Opinion

Editorial

Wheat price dilemma
Updated 26 Oct, 2026

Wheat price dilemma

A price no buyer is obliged or financially equipped to pay is only a number. Growers seem to have grasped this before the government did.
Encounter culture
Updated 26 Oct, 2026

Encounter culture

Whether police actions in "encounters" were legitimate or unlawful can only be established through credible investigations.
Recognising distress
26 Oct, 2026

Recognising distress

THE deaths of two families in Karachi, being investigated as suspected murder-suicides, raise disturbing questions...
Prudent warning
Updated 25 Oct, 2026

Prudent warning

Muslim countries have warned against a new conflict. But will the war lobbies in Washington and Tel Aviv listen?
Party of one
25 Oct, 2026

Party of one

IT ill behoves a political party that claims to be the biggest and most popular in the country to be so mired in...
Reckless driving
25 Oct, 2026

Reckless driving

THERE is a lack of official data documenting the crisis, but even by the most conservative estimates, over a dozen...