LONDON, April 25: Former Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto further fuelled speculations about an impending deal between her and President Gen Pervez Musharraf by agreeing to a suggestion that such a deal would adversely affect her credibility, but for her, she said, restoration of democracy in Pakistan and saving the country from falling into the hands of extremists was more important than her credibility.

She had been asked, would not her credibility be severely damaged if she entered into a deal with President Musharraf.

The PPP chairperson was answering questions on Tuesday evening after a lecture on the current situation in Pakistan at the jam-packed Hong Kong Theatre in the London School of Economics and Sciences.

Replying to another question, she accepted for the first time that it was her government’s mistake in the mid-1990s to encourage and promote the Taliban.

She said at that time she had thought the Taliban to be a peaceful and stabilising alternative to warring Mujahideen factions.

She reserved most of her wrath for the ruling PML, MMA and elements promoting extremism in Pakistan. She did blame the army and the ISI for all the ills the country is facing today but took extreme care to avoid mentioning President Musharraf by name even in passing.

She said that without ousting the PML and its allies from power, the war against extremism and terrorism could not be won.

She was highly critical of the government for allowing what she called creeping Talibanisation in the country by ignoring the important task of reforming madressahs and allowing religious parties like the MMA and militant organisations like the Lashkars to operate unhindered in the country and marginalising popular moderate political parties.

Answering a question, she said the PPP, PML-N and other parties in the ARD were united on the issue of restoration of democracy and their one-point goal was to close the doors for ever on army take-overs. She said there was only one way to combat successfully the creeping extremism in the country and that was to let the moderate political parties having faith in undiluted democracy to function unhindered.

In her lecture, she traced the history of what she called the rise of extremism in Pakistan and held the 25 years of army rule in the last 30 years responsible for the serious crisis now engulfing the country.

She accused the West and the US of buying crises from Pakistan which the successive military regimes in Pakistan, according to her, were able to sell successfully.

A short burst of mocking laughter ensued from a section of audience when Ms Bhutto claimed that if her second government had not been dismissed in 1996, the 9/11 incident would not have happened.

Opinion

Respite needed

Respite needed

All one can fear is a familiar accounting exercise that aims to extract a few more rupees from a narrow, weary economic base.

Editorial

Soft on traders
08 Jun, 2026

Soft on traders

THE Fixed Tax Asaan Scheme for traders with an annual turnover of up to Rs200m has been designed as a ‘pragmatic...
Ceasefire in name
Updated 08 Jun, 2026

Ceasefire in name

Both sides accuse the other of violating the truce that was supposed to halt the conflict in April, yet neither appears willing to abandon negotiations altogether.
Damaged childhoods
08 Jun, 2026

Damaged childhoods

CHILD abuse is so prevalent that the UN ranked Pakistan as the least safe country for children. Even so, more than...
JAAC ban
Updated 07 Jun, 2026

JAAC ban

Though the JAAC’s demands are open to scrutiny, banning any political organisation — as long as it remains committed to peaceful activism — is undemocratic.
GB election
Updated 07 Jun, 2026

GB election

It is important that whichever party ultimately forms the government puts the needs of the people of GB above everything else.
ODI win
07 Jun, 2026

ODI win

AT last, the Pakistan cricket team had something to celebrate: a One-day International series victory against...