WASHINGTON: High-level economic talks between China and the United States this week failed to ease trade rifts between the two economic giants, risking rising tensions ahead of the race for the US presidency.
Chinese Vice Premier Wu Yi and a delegation of ministers left the US capital on Friday, after days of talks that made modest advances but were overshadowed by a lack of concrete progress on the key issue of China’s currency.
What US Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson had billed as a dialogue to address long-term issues gave way to short-term political jockeying as Washington pushed for rapid currency reform and China pushed back.
Wu made it clear that China would stick to reforming its exchange rate regime at its own pace. That riled China’s critics in Congress, who renewed the threat of punitive legislation. They were also unimpressed by commitments Beijing made to further opening of its financial services and aviation sectors.
“An American friend of mine likened them to two rich men with bad table manners,” Sun Zhe, a professor in the Centre for American Studies at Fudan University in Shanghai, said of the latest round of the “strategic economic dialogue.”
“China sees itself as a guest who turned up and is then treated to criticism and bad treatment. The US sees China as too stiff and inflexible,” Sun said. “So it appears that we can expect more bills over Chinese trade.”
A number of US politicians are preparing legislation that would penalise imports from China to counter what they say is a currency that is unfairly undervalued by as much as 40 per cent.
POLITICAL CALENDAR: William Overholt, director of the Centre for Asia Pacific Policy at the RAND Corporation in Santa Monica, California, said both sides were at fault for sticking to untenable positions.
For one, the argument that the value of the yuan was responsible for the large US trade deficit with China — which hit $233 billion last year — was “just wrong,” Overholt said.
“On the other side, the Chinese stalling on letting American beef into their market on the grounds that it’s unsafe ... just makes no sense at all,” he said, referring to one of the issues on which the Bush administration pressed Beijing this week.
China stopped importing US beef when mad cow disease surfaced in the United States in 2003.
Overholt said protectionist sentiment would only get worse as the 2008 presidential election neared. “It’s building towards one of those crescendos we often see as political campaigns heat up,” he said.
Susan Shirk, a former US State Department official responsible for relations with China, said the fact that Beijing had not offered any major initiatives in the talks would not sit well in Washington.
Smaller disputes, such as worries about toxins in Chinese ingredients making their way into pet food and other products, also were swaying the public mood, said Shirk, now a professor at the University of California, San Diego.—Reuters
