The ‘common goal’
BY agreeing in their meeting in Islamabad to put together a ‘charter of demands’, Ms Bhutto and Mr Sharif have questioned the credibility of the current caretaker setup and the election commission. It is heartening that the two former prime ministers are still willing that their parties contest the Jan 8 election, provided it is free and fair. Their coming together should serve as a wake-up call for the president. The pitch has been more than queered by the election commission’s rejection of nomination papers filed by the Sharif brothers, and neither is willing to contest the decision because of a total distrust of the authorities concerned. Ms Bhutto’s criticism of the barring of the Sharifs from the polls means that her party will settle for little less than complete transparency of the process, should it take part in the election. The ball, as she said, was now in the regime’s court.
The alleged lack of impartiality of the caretaker administration as the minimum common denominator on which Ms Bhutto and Mr Sharif agree should add to President Musharraf’s worries, or show him the light ahead, depending on whether he sees it as a threat or as an opportunity to make amends. Any election held under the circumstances will not be acceptable to the entire opposition, save perhaps Maulana Fazlur Rahman. What credibility an election which only the erstwhile ruling party and its officially designated leader of the opposition regard as free and fair will have is anybody’s guess. The maulana is not even keeping up appearances, little as Haji Saifullah Khan did while representing a friendly opposition in Gen Ziaul Haq’s Majlis-i-Shoora of the 1980s, the assembly in which Junejo emerged as the prime minister. The general got away with it then because he had kept his military uniform on — a dubious advantage that Mr Musharraf has had to deny himself.
The Bhutto-Sharif meeting was also an indication that a certain amount of badly needed maturity has come to stabilise their rocky relations since the formation of the APDM for chasing what Ms Bhutto calls a ‘common goal’, and despite the many differences that remain between them. A shared distrust of the caretaker rulers has led Ms Bhutto to step down from her earlier stance that she would not be part of any negotiations involving the religious parties. For his part, Mr Sharif too refrained from rubbing in the APDM’s known position on boycotting the election, pending an assessment of the two sides’ positions on the issue by a mutually approved eight-member committee. It is clear that for the election to have any transparency the government will have to re-think the composition of the current caretaker setup and the rules governing the election commission. This is the least expected to be demanded by the combined opposition in its ‘charter of demands’. President Musharraf’s response to the demands will decide how important it is for him to have any credibility attached to the next parliament.

