MOSCOW: Russia’s next president will start off in a double act with his predecessor and mentor Vladimir Putin, but over time Dmitry Medvedev may evolve into a different leader.

Medvedev, a 42-year-old lawyer, won an easy victory in Sunday’s presidential election and lost no time in appearing on stage together with his boss at a victory rock concert in Red Square, pledging a “direct continuation” of his policies.

Analysts say it remains to be seen whether that will be the case once Medvedev gets his hands on the levers of power and his fingers on Russia’s nuclear trigger.

Putin himself was initially viewed as a safe option who could be easily manipulated by then-president Boris Yeltsin’s inner circle when he was plucked from obscurity in 1999 and thrust into the presidency.

Within a year, he had changed direction dramatically, centralising control in the Kremlin, clamping down on free media and the opposition, and pursuing a hawkish line with the West.

Now Putin, a 55-year-old former KGB spy with a liking for martial arts and the military, has chosen a man from a different generation with a different style to succeed him after serving the maximum two consecutive terms allowed by the constitution.

Though Putin has said he will serve as Medvedev’s prime minister, some analysts believe this could be more to help his protege find his feet than to control him as a puppetmaster.

Georgy Satarov, an adviser to Boris Yeltsin and head of the INDEM think tank, said: “I do not think that if this scheme (of Putin as PM under Medvedev) is implemented, it is intended for any long period of functioning.”

“If in the beginning Putin heads the government, after... they are convinced that everything is stable, Putin will give that post to someone else.”Although both men have heavily emphasised continuity, their declarations of unity mask big differences of style.

Often dubbed the most liberal member of Putin’s inner circle, Medvedev has no known security service background, enjoyed forbidden Western rock music during his youth and worked as a corporate lawyer before entering the government. Putin, by contrast, was a career KGB official who served in East Germany and has never worked in the private sector.

And while Putin loves posing for tough-guy photos in military uniform and making macho statements in colourful slang, Medvedev prefers suits and cautiously worded, lawyerly speeches.

In a speech last year at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Medvedev stressed the importance of freedom, saying “no undemocratic country has ever become truly prosperous”.

Sceptics discarded his remarks as propaganda for a Western audience, saying Medvedev’s track record as a close Putin ally suggested a man who cared little for democracy or the law.

But Medvedev faces different challenges to Putin, who first came to power amid an economic crisis, a strong separatist rebel challenge and the risk of the country disintegrating altogether.

“Today’s president is not faced with wrenching the country out of the rubble of the 1998 financial crisis and the Chechen war, but rather with the challenge to shift the economy’s growth away from natural resources”, said investment bank Renaissance Capital in a note.

Although Russia is enjoying the ninth year of an economic boom unmatched in living memory, storm clouds are already gathering over Medvedev’s four-year term, which begins in May.

Booming imports and stagnant exports are quickly shrinking Russia’s trade surplus and will likely push it into the red within two years, according to economists’ forecasts.

“The economic growth of the last years has been based on rising oil prices and cheap foreign borrowing,” said Yevgeny Gavrilenkov, chief economist at local brokerage Troika Dialog.

“External conditions will not be so favourable in the future.”

Such concerns, analysts say, lay behind a rare joint appeal in January by top economic figures in the government for a softening of the Kremlin’s harsh foreign policy course.

Government generosity with wages and pensions ahead of

the election has stoked inflation, which is now running at more than 12 per cent a year. Opinion polls show rising prices are among voters’ top concerns.—Reuters

Opinion

Editorial

System failure
Updated 12 Nov, 2024

System failure

Relevant institutions often treat right to internet connectivity with the same disdain as they do civil and political rights.
Narrowing the gap
12 Nov, 2024

Narrowing the gap

PERHAPS a pat on the back is in order for the ECP. Together with Nadra, it has made visible efforts to reduce...
Back on their feet
12 Nov, 2024

Back on their feet

A STIRRING comeback in the series has ended Pakistan’s 22-year wait for victory against world champions Australia....
Time to deliver
Updated 11 Nov, 2024

Time to deliver

Pakistan must display a serious commitment to climate change adaptation and mitigation at home.
Smaller government
11 Nov, 2024

Smaller government

THE IMF bailout programme has put the government under pressure to curtail its spending, especially current...
Unsafe inheritance
11 Nov, 2024

Unsafe inheritance

DESPITE regulations, the troubling practice of robbing women of their rightful inheritance — the culprits are ...