Fehmida Mirza — the Nancy Pelosi of Pakistan
By Amir Mateen
IN the heat of the heady times that we are going through, Dr Fehmida Mirza’s election as the first-ever woman speaker of the National Assembly may have added another historic leaf.
She was immediately dubbed as Pakistan’s Nancy Pelosi. “We may be behind the US that elected Ms Pelosi as leader of the US House of Representatives in 2002, but we are decades ahead in having Benazir Bhutto as the first woman head of state,” said journalist Nusrat Javed, who claimed exclusive copyright for the attribution.
“We have to see if they (Americans) match us now by electing Hillary.”
Perhaps Fehmida’s dynamism and charm struck out better in contrast to her predecessor’s lacklustre demeanour. Chaudhary Ameer Hussain looked visibly sad in relinquishing the charge. But his positive words at the parting may have slightly compensated for the partiality that he had showed all these years in bulldozing bills, ordinances and even a controversial constitutional amendment.
Also important was the figure of 249 votes that Fehmida Mirza got in the process. This means that if the ruling alliance could muster 54 votes in the Senate they will have a possible strength to impeach the president in a joint session of the parliament.
But then there was an eerie abstinence from the mention of the ‘M’ word throughout the proceedings. Neither Pervaiz Elahi talked about Musharraf the mentor, nor did Javed Hashmi name him as the tormentor.
There were a lot of allusions to the GHQ, the establishment and what not by Khawaja Asif, Maulana Fazlur Rehman and others but, like that villain in Harry Potter’s books, the M word was forbidden. Are we seeing things where none might exist? Perhaps not.
Ms Fehmida’s credentials to become the speaker are more than reasonably valid. A three-time member herself, she also had her father and husband as members of the National Assembly. Her spouse, Dr Zulfiqar Mirza, is now tipped to become home minister in Sindh.
Couple Raj
Therein lies a small hitch that may reflect a bigger problem. Those in favour are being rewarded not just in ‘ones’ but ‘twos’.
“It’s a couple Raj,” aptly commented a colleague in the press gallery. While the prime couple around Benazir Bhutto --- Safdar Abbassi and Nahid Khan --- is out, an array of new ones have set in.
Farah Nawaz Isphahani, with little or no history of being a party activist, has been rewarded by a ticket to the House from women’s quota. Now her husband, Hussain Haqqani, is tipped to become Pakistan’s ambassador in Washington.
Farzana Raja, already an MNA on women’s quota, is one of the candidates for the information portfolio. Her spouse, Pir Mukaram Shah, is likely to be adjusted somewhere, while his brother Pir Mazharul Haq is already the leader of the Sindh Parliamentary party.
Khalid Ghurki is Nazim in a rural area of Lahore, while wife Sameena has been made an MNA. Ahmad Riaz Sheikh, a former FIA goon who made his name while working as deputy director of immigration and was later jailed on various charges, has been reportedly made, horror of horrors, media adviser.
We are not sure whether this constitutes his promotion or the demotion of fellow hacks. His wife, already an MPA in Punjab, is eying a slot in the Punjab cabinet. Shahbaz Sharif is definitely going to resent it, given his history of trouble with her husband.
This pattern in Asif Zardari’s decision-making gives an impression that the party is his personal fief. Many feel that loyalty has become a bigger criterion than merit and service to the party.
Those who fear that this may be the last chance for the party may not be entirely wrong.
The party did not fare as well in the last polls as some might think. It got 80 directly elected seats in the 2002 elections, which (Gen) Ehtesham the Conscientious (after retirement, that is) confirmed as rigged.
Had the polls been fairer, the PPP might have got 100 seats.
In last month’s elections the party got only 87 seats. This was despite the sympathy wave caused by the assassination of Benazir Bhutto.
Analysts agree that besides bad electioneering, it was the dilly-dallying on the issue of the judiciary that damaged the PPP. The party, one has to admit, got power on the crutches of the lawyers’ struggle. The revolution may be far from over.
Aitzaz Ahsan was not in the house during all those fancy speeches, but his demons were haunting all of them sitting inside. The focus of power, it seemed, had shifted from the parliament, the executive and the establishment to the forces out on the streets, loosely named as the lawyers’ movement, civil society or media activists. Whether it is good or bad, only time will tell. What is sure is that the lawyers ‘aint sitting home’.
It was obvious in a meeting with Mr Aitzaz that the lawyers were not leaving the matter to the political parties alone. While they will give the parliament 30 days to come up with a resolution on the reinstatement of judges, they will not waste this time in their chambers.
“We shall be back to the streets two days after Chaudhary Iftikhar is released by the new government,” Mr Aitzaz said in a meeting with Dawn the other day.
“Of course, this will remain non-violent and will not be against the parliament or the new government.”
The first stop, he said, will be Rawalpindi, then Lahore, Faisalabad, Multan and then to the final destination that matters -- Karachi. It sure will be a test of nerves for both the MQM and the PPP.
Surely also, the unclogged media and the civil society are ‘aint sitting home. If the PPP fails to go along with these forces, say our pundits, Master Bilawal may have to rely more on Mamoon (uncle) Aitzaz than Papa Zardari to regain whatever is left of the party.
Until last reports came in, the PML-Q was busy trying to find out which one of their members had voted for Dr Fehmida. They need to wait for just another fortnight when the names will come up in the form of a forward bloc.
Until the last count they were short of just two for making it to the 13 members required for the bloc.


