No back-channel talks on Iran: US

Published April 15, 2008

WASHINGTON, April 14: The United States on Monday denied a British press report of back-channel talks between Washington and Iran on Tehran’s controversial nuclear programme.

In London, The Independent newspaper reported on Monday that a group of former US diplomats and foreign policy experts had been holding talks for the past five years with Iranian academics and policy advisers, in hopes of reaching a breakthrough on the diplomatic impasse.

But a White House official on Monday, speaking anonymously, said “clear channels” exist for communication with Iran, and that the approach described in the Independent article “isn’t one of them.” The daily quoted former US undersecretary of state Thomas Pickering as saying that the United States had pursued five years of talks with Iran, despite decades of tense relations publicly, and amid continuing strife over the Islamic Republic’s failure to heed international ultimatums that it suspend uranium enrichment.

The US State Department was equally emphatic that the talks described in the article were “not a government activity,” but instead “a set of private discussions.” ”It is not a channel for negotiation. It is not a channel to pass messages. It has no official standing whatsoever,” said Tom Casey, a State Department spokesman.

Casey said, however, that the United States was not indisposed to the talks going ahead.

“It is a set of private discussions by private individuals and we are happy to see those move forward. But no one should mistake that for any kind of formal, informal or any kind of channel. Period.”

Meanwhile, the Washington Post reported last week that the Bush administration has launched “an interagency assessment of what is known about Iranian activities and intentions, how to combat them and how to capitalise on them.” The United States broke diplomatic relations with Iran in April 1980, after Iranian students seized the US embassy and held hundreds of US diplomats captive in the aftermath of its revolution, and the two countries have had tense relations ever since.—AFP

Opinion

Editorial

Fragile peace
Updated 07 Jan, 2025

Fragile peace

Those who have lost loved ones, as well as those whose property has been destroyed in the clashes, must get justice.
Captive power cut
07 Jan, 2025

Captive power cut

THE IMF’s refusal to relax its demand for discontinuation of massively subsidised gas supplies to mostly...
National embarrassment
Updated 07 Jan, 2025

National embarrassment

The global eradication of polio is within reach and Pakistan has no excuse to remain an outlier.
Poll petitions’ delay
Updated 06 Jan, 2025

Poll petitions’ delay

THOUGH electoral transparency and justice are essential for the health of any democracy, the relevant quarters in...
Migration racket
06 Jan, 2025

Migration racket

A KEY part of dismantling human smuggling and illegal migration rackets in the country — along with busting the...
Power planning
06 Jan, 2025

Power planning

THE National Electric Power Regulatory Authority, the power sector regulator, has rightly blamed poor planning for...