MOSCOW, May 27: A top Russian general warned on Tuesday that the military will take the necessary countermeasures in response to US missile defence plans, but added that Moscow has no intention of developing a similar missile shield.

Lt Gen Yevgeny Buzhinsky told reporters that Russia was thinking about “asymmetrical” steps if the United States deploys missile defence elements in Europe, but refused to elaborate what specific measures the military might take.

Buzhinsky said Russia appreciated US proposals intended to soothe Russian concerns, but said they were not enough to change Moscow’s perception that the US system would undermine its security.

Washington has promised to delay activating the planned new sites in Poland and the Czech Republic unless Iran proves itself an imminent threat to Europe. It also offered to let Russian officers monitor the sites to make sure they are not directed against Russia.

“We welcome these proposals as a step in the right direction, the acknowledgment that the Russian concerns are well-grounded,” Buzhinsky, who heads the Russian Defence Ministry’s international cooperation department, said at a news conference. “But the United States needs to abandon its plans to deploy missile defence components in Europe if it wants to remove Russia’s concerns.”

He shrugged off U.S. assurances that a planned radar in the Czech Republic and a battery of 10 missile interceptors in Poland would pose no danger to huge Russian nuclear arsenals, and said that the U.S. would be able to expand the system quickly.

“New elements could be added to this small component, and we will have an entire web of anti-missile sites around our borders,” Buzhinsky said.

He added that the U.S. trust-building measures lacked specifics and were “formulated in such a way that they could be cancelled at any moment.”

Buzhinsky said that talks on giving Russian officers permanent access to the planned facilities in Poland and the Czech Republic had bogged down in arguments. He dismissed Polish and Czech arguments that they could only let Russian officers in on the basis of reciprocity.

Buzhinsky said that a Polish demand to be able to see other military facilities in Russia’s westernmost Kaliningrad region was “absurd,” urging the United States to persuade its allies to let Russian monitors in.

Russia has cooperated with the EU nations in planning a more limited missile defense that would protect troops on joint peacekeeping missions. Buzhinsky said Russia would end this cooperation if the EU nations join in the U.S. missile defense shield.Buzhinsky said that Russia would respond to the U.S. missile defence plans without plunging into a new arms race.

“We are thinking about asymmetrical measures, we have them,” Buzhinsky said, without explaining. “Naturally, we envisage possible retaliatory measures to minimize the risk for our security.”

Russian officials have said that new Topol-M intercontinental ballistic missiles will be able to overcome any prospective missile defence. They also boasted about a new, maneuverable nuclear warhead, which may zigzag on its way to target, dodging an enemy’s missile shield.

Former President Vladimir Putin warned that Russia may point nuclear missiles at countries that would host US missile defense components.

Buzhinsky refused on Tuesday to say what specific retaliatory action the military has in mind, but he said Russia does not plan to strengthen the existing missile defence system protecting Moscow, which was developed in the 1970s.

That system was built in accordance with the 1972 Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty, which allowed both the US and the Soviet Union to have one area protected by missile defence. The United States withdrew from the treaty in 2002 in order to deploy a national missile defence shield, ignoring Moscow’s protests.

“We have Moscow missile defence zone, and I’m unaware of any plans to expand it,” Buzhinsky said. “It would be very expensive. We have different priorities in the development and modernization of our military other than creation of these toys.”—AP

Must Read

Opinion

Editorial

The ban question
Updated 02 Dec, 2024

The ban question

Parties that want PTI to be banned don't seem to realise they're veering away from the very ‘democratic’ credentials they claim to possess.
5G charade
02 Dec, 2024

5G charade

THE government’s lofty plans for the 5G spectrum auction are an insult to the collective intelligence of the...
Syria offensive
02 Dec, 2024

Syria offensive

AFTER several years of relative calm, the Syrian civil war has begun to heat up again, with Idlib-based rebel...
Flying ban reversal
Updated 01 Dec, 2024

Flying ban reversal

Only the naive can expect the reinstatement of European operations to help restore PIA’s profitability.
Kurram conflict
01 Dec, 2024

Kurram conflict

DESPITE a ceasefire being in place, violence has continued in Kurram tribal district. The latest round of bloodshed...
World AIDS Day
01 Dec, 2024

World AIDS Day

IT is a travesty that, decades after HIV/AIDS first perplexed medics, awareness about the disease remains low in...