NEW DELHI, June 25: The Indian government and its communist allies on Wednesday failed to settle an impasse over a landmark nuclear deal with the United States, but decided to continue talks.

Faced with a choice of breaking with the communists and heading to early elections or abandoning the deal, the government chose to stall for more time.

“The committee completed its discussions on all aspects of the Indo-US civil nuclear cooperation agreement. The next meeting of the committee, to be convened in due course, will finalise its findings,” said Indian Foreign Minister Pranab Mukherjee, reading from a terse statement after the meeting.

He declined to answer questions.

Mukherjee represented the governing Congress party at the hour-long talks with leaders of the communist parties and heads of several smaller members of the ruling coalition.

The nuclear deal would reverse three decades of American policy by allowing the shipment of atomic fuel and technology to India, which has not signed international non-proliferation accords and has tested nuclear weapons.

India, in exchange, would open its civilian reactors to international inspections.

The deal has faced stiff opposition from India’s communist parties, which don’t want to see New Delhi drawn closer to Washington.

The communists, who prop up the government from the outside, have threatened to withdraw their support if the current administration presses on with the nuclear pact, a move that could topple the government and lead to early elections.

For India to move ahead with the deal it needs to sign a separate deal with the UN’s International Atomic Energy Agency that’s needed before the US Congress can approve the pact.

There was no change of heart from the communists after the talks.

“We will not allow this government to go for the IAEA board approval,” said Debabrata Biswas, a senior communist official who attended the meeting.

With no concessions from the communists, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh would be forced to either move forward without their support — a risky political move — or abandon the much touted nuclear agreement.—AP

Opinion

Editorial

Lingering concerns
19 Sep, 2024

Lingering concerns

Embarrassed after failing to muster numbers during the high-stakes drama that played out all weekend, the govt will need time to regroup.
Pager explosions
Updated 19 Sep, 2024

Pager explosions

This dangerous brinkmanship is likely to drag the region — and the global economy — into a vortex of violence and instability.
Losing to China
19 Sep, 2024

Losing to China

AT a time when they should have stepped up, a sense of complacency seemed to have descended on the Pakistan hockey...
Parliament’s place
Updated 17 Sep, 2024

Parliament’s place

Efforts to restore parliament’s sanctity must rise above all political differences and legislative activities must be open to scrutiny and debate.
Afghan policy flux
Updated 18 Sep, 2024

Afghan policy flux

A fresh approach is needed, where Pakistan’s security is prioritised and decision taken to improve ties. Afghan Taliban also need to respond in kind.
HIV/AIDS outbreak
17 Sep, 2024

HIV/AIDS outbreak

MULTIPLE factors — the government’s inability to put its people first, a rickety health infrastructure, and...