US strikes necessary: Washington Post

Published September 15, 2008

WASHINGTON, Sept 14: US military strikes at Taliban and Al Qaeda targets inside Pakistan are risky but necessary and were long overdue, says a Washington Post editorial published on Sunday.

“They must continue.”

The newspaper claimed that for more than six years, the Bush administration relied on Pakistan to combat the militants but it only strengthened the Taliban and Al Qaeda networks in Fata.

The policy, the Post said, also led to a steady increase in Taliban assaults on US and Nato forces in Afghanistan while US intelligence community believed that Al Qaeda was using its bases to prepare for new attacks on Western targets, including the United States.

“By now it is clear that Pakistani army and security forces lack the capacity to defeat the extremists — and may even support some of the Taliban commanders,” the paper claimed. “Pakistan’s army has arranged truces with some of the extremists that don’t preclude them from fighting in Afghanistan.”

Opinion

Editorial

PIA’s privatisation
Updated 01 Jul, 2026

PIA’s privatisation

THE management control of PIA has finally been transferred to a consortium comprising private investors and the ...
Rights beyond rulings
01 Jul, 2026

Rights beyond rulings

THE Supreme Court’s recent ruling that jewellery, bridal gifts and dowry articles given to a bride remain her...
Asia left behind
01 Jul, 2026

Asia left behind

ALARMING regression has been witnessed in the Asian teams at the FIFA World Cup. A record nine representatives from...
Resurgent threat
Updated 30 Jun, 2026

Resurgent threat

THE message from Islamabad to Kabul seems to be clear: any act of terrorism inside Pakistan found to be linked to...
Unchecked powers
30 Jun, 2026

Unchecked powers

THERE is little disagreement that Punjab needs stronger tools to combat organised crime, habitual offenders and...
Patriot Pass
30 Jun, 2026

Patriot Pass

IT must be a shared humanity that has bonded the ‘leader of the free world’ so closely with his counterparts in...