WASHINGTON, Nov 5: A deadly attack on a US outpost in eastern Afghanistan in July was executed with the support of local police and government leaders as well as villagers there, according to an internal US military report.

The report, released on Tuesday, recommended that the district’s Afghan police chief and governor be replaced, if not arrested and tried for committing crimes against the government. It also said the incident was an example of repeated problems in the volatile mountain region where the local population was offering “passive and active support” to the insurgents, which also had infiltrated the country’s security forces.

Nine US troops were killed in the attack, launched just before midnight on July 12 by about 200 insurgents. Another 27 US troops were wounded, and of those, 11 were treated and returned to duty.

At least 21 and perhaps as many as 52 of the attackers were killed and another 45 wounded, the report said.

The report was completed on August 13, but an unclassified version was not released until this week. It confirmed many details previously released to the public about the incident, including suspicions that villagers were complicit in the attack.

The assault did not come without warning. Coalition forces had received numerous intelligence reports that an attack on the base was planned, but such threats are not unusual in that volatile region along the Pakistan border.

What was not expected, however, “was the collusion that took place” between the Afghan National Police chief and the insurgents, the report said. Troops also did not see that citizens from nearby Wanat began leaving the village that evening.

“Post-attack intelligence indicates that the district police chief and district governor were complicit in supporting the ... attack,” said the report, which was compiled by leaders in the US Army unit that came under assault.

The report also noted that enemy forces fired on troops from within the homes of villagers and from the local mosque, adding that “they could not have achieved surprise without at least the passive support of the villagers”.—AP