JERUSALEM, Feb 16: Tzipi Livni, who hopes to be appointed Israel’s prime minister-designate, said on Monday Israel must give up considerable territory in exchange for peace with the Palestinians, drawing a clear distinction with her rival, Binyamin Netanyahu.

She told a convention of the Conference of Presidents of Major American Organisations: “We need to give up half of the Land of Israel,” using a term that refers to biblical borders that include today’s Israel, the West Bank and Gaza.

She explained that such a withdrawal would be for the good of Israel, to maintain it as a Jewish state.

Livni told the US Jewish leaders that Israel must take the initiative and come forward with its own peace plan to head off international programs. “Any plan put on the table will not be in our interest,” she said.

Livni’s centrist Kadima Party won one more seat than the hawkish Likud, led by Netanyahu. He opposes large-scale territorial concessions in peace talks with the Palestinians. He believes negotiations should concentrate instead on building up the Palestinian economy. Netanyahu and Livni, the current foreign minister, both claimed victory in last week’s election. Each hopes to be picked by President Shimon Peres to form the next government.

Netanyahu appears to have the edge, because a majority of members in the new parliament agree with his views.

Official results of Israel’s election are scheduled to be published on Wednesday, and then Peres will begin formal consultations with the 12 parties in the new parliament. He is expected to choose a premier-designate within a few days, starting a period of up to six weeks for coalition negotiations.

In his address before the gathering, Netanyahu ruled out unilateral pullbacks from territory, criticising Israel’s withdrawal from Gaza in 2005, charging that it allowed Hamas to take over there.

He said he, too, does not want to govern Palestinians, but Israel must maintain control of all borders, airspace and electronic traffic, indicating that his offer to the Palestinians would be considerably less than a sovereign state.

“Regardless how the solution is achieved, the Palestinians should run their lives,” he said. “They should govern themselves, but they shouldn’t have certain powers that would threaten the state of Israel.”—AP

Opinion

Editorial

Risky slope
Updated 17 Dec, 2024

Risky slope

THE latest reduction of 200bps in the State Bank’s policy rate appears moderate in the backdrop of calls from...
Digital ID bill
17 Dec, 2024

Digital ID bill

THEY appear to be at it again — bulldozing legislation. The government now has a plan to turn Pakistan into a...
Dangerous revisionism
17 Dec, 2024

Dangerous revisionism

THE ongoing campaign by Sangh Parivar fanatics in India questioning the origins of mosques and other Muslim holy...
Remembering APS
Updated 16 Dec, 2024

Remembering APS

Ten years later, the state must fully commit itself to implementing NAP if Pakistan is to be rid of terrorism and fanaticism.
Cricket momentum
16 Dec, 2024

Cricket momentum

A WASHOUT at The Wanderers saw Pakistan avoid a series whitewash but they will go into the One-day International...
Grievous trade
16 Dec, 2024

Grievous trade

THE UN’s Global Report on Trafficking in Persons 2024 is a sobering account of how the commodification of humans...