THE world would have reacted with scepticism to President Barack Obama's announcement on Wednesday that America was withdrawing from Afghanistan “from a position of strength”. Announcing the much-awaited drawdown timetable for American forces in Afghanistan, the president claimed that Al Qaeda was now “under pressure” more than ever before and that “serious losses” had been inflicted on the Taliban. However, there is no evidence that the US-led forces have turned the corner or that the militants have been put on the defensive, much less beaten. Instead, the militants must be encouraged by Washington's plan that all American combat troops will withdraw by 2013, causing a vacuum which the US wants the Afghan security forces to fill. Given the Karzai regime's dismal record in terms of institution building, this appears to be a pipedream. The strength of the Afghan National Army is far below the stipulated strength, and the government's writ doesn't run in the greater part of the country.

The most disturbing part of the Obama speech is the haze that surrounds the president's future plans for Afghanistan. Even though he said the withdrawal of the “surge” troops in two stages would mark “the beginning, but not the end” of America's efforts to wind down the war, the speech contains no well-defined political targets for the future. There are no references to the war-ravaged country's rebuilding or to the way he would like the Karzai administration to take on the militants politically or militarily. Instead, he made it clear in his speech that America would not try to make Afghanistan “a perfect place” and that it would “not police its streets or patrol its mountains indefinitely” — words that must comfort the Taliban.

The president agreed that there had to be a peaceful settlement, but gave no details about the interlocutors, insisting that the negotiations “must be led by the Afghan government”. While there was some “tough talk”, as the US press called it, on Pakistan and safe havens, the president kept the status of the negotiations a mystery and did not indicate how he would take on board regional countries like Pakistan which have a stake in Afghanistan's future. Ten years after a war that, according to one report, costs $2bn per week, America is preparing to abandon the Af-Pak region without having achieved any of its political and military objectives. Its reluctant Nato partners were the first to sense that the war was lost and for that reason never had their hearts in the fighting. America came to this realisation much later, thus adding considerably to Pakistan's challenges.

Opinion

Editorial

Short-changed?
Updated 24 Nov, 2024

Short-changed?

As nations continue to argue, the international community must recognise that climate finance is not merely about numbers.
Overblown ‘threat’
24 Nov, 2024

Overblown ‘threat’

ON the eve of the PTI’s ‘do or die’ protest in the federal capital, there seemed to be little evidence of the...
Exclusive politics
24 Nov, 2024

Exclusive politics

THERE has been a gradual erasure of the voices of most marginalised groups from Pakistan’s mainstream political...
Counterterrorism plan
Updated 23 Nov, 2024

Counterterrorism plan

Lacunae in our counterterrorism efforts need to be plugged quickly.
Bullish stock market
23 Nov, 2024

Bullish stock market

NORMALLY, stock markets rise gradually. In recent months, however, Pakistan’s stock market has soared to one ...
Political misstep
Updated 23 Nov, 2024

Political misstep

To drag a critical ally like Saudi Arabia into unfounded conspiracies is detrimental to Pakistan’s foreign policy.