THIS refers to the letter ‘India and Indus Water Treaty’ by Bashir A. Malik, in response to the Indian High Commission’s Islamabad spokesperson Siddharth Zutshi’s letter ‘Controversial project: Indian version’.

Pakistan’s anxieties as the lower riparian are understandable; even with a ‘water-tight’ treaty in place, there will always be apprehensions that this treaty could be violated, but Mr Malik’s assertion that “scores of Indian dams” are already in “flagrant breach of the treaty” is incorrect. Pakistan’s apprehensions regarding shared waters should be addressed by all means but on the basis of fact and reason, not emotions and misconceptions.

It is important to note that all the dams currently built on the western rivers are run-of the river dams which India is permitted to build under the Indus Water Treaty (IWT) and this fact was conceded to by Mr Malik himself at the end of his letter.

When there is a point of difference or dispute, it has followed the institutional framework stipulated in the IWT.

This was the case with the Baglihar Dam, the Wullar Barrage or Tulbul Navigational Lock and it is the case with the Kishanganga Dam.

Other dams also undergo a rigorous process of discussion between Indian and Pakistani officials in the Indus Water Commission. Not every project reaches the stage of ‘Dispute’ or ‘Arbitration’.

At times the problems are resolved within the Indus Commission itself.

The Indian government has not confirmed the design of the Bursar project and it has stated that it will give Pakistan six months notice before it starts construction as stipulated under the IWT.

Once it does, The Bursar Dam will no doubt undergo the same level of scrutiny from Indian, Pakistani and even international quarters if need be.

Low water supply in Pakistan is more a product of water conveyance losses, unequal distribution, salinization, pollution, poor demand management and climate change than it is a consequence of Indian damming — problems faced by many countries around the world, including India.

Water is actually one of the more manageable issues between India and Pakistan and can even be used as a stepping stone in the dialogue process, but incendiary rhetoric can set otherwise amicable discussions off-colour and can cause unnecessary animosity between the two neighbours.

It is not enough that the governments of Pakistan and India understand the facts about their shared water situation.

Popular opinion in both countries should also share a transparent and objective ‘water narrative’.

GITANJALI BAKSHI Author, ‘Indus Equation’ & Coordinator, South Asia Security Unit Strategic Foresight Group Mumbai

Opinion

Editorial

Judiciary’s SOS
Updated 28 Mar, 2024

Judiciary’s SOS

The ball is now in CJP Isa’s court, and he will feel pressure to take action.
Data protection
28 Mar, 2024

Data protection

WHAT do we want? Data protection laws. When do we want them? Immediately. Without delay, if we are to prevent ...
Selling humans
28 Mar, 2024

Selling humans

HUMAN traders feed off economic distress; they peddle promises of a better life to the impoverished who, mired in...
New terror wave
Updated 27 Mar, 2024

New terror wave

The time has come for decisive government action against militancy.
Development costs
27 Mar, 2024

Development costs

A HEFTY escalation of 30pc in the cost of ongoing federal development schemes is one of the many decisions where the...
Aitchison controversy
Updated 27 Mar, 2024

Aitchison controversy

It is hoped that higher authorities realise that politics and nepotism have no place in schools.