Benazir Bhutto was killed in a gun and suicide bomb attack after an election rally in Rawalpindi on December 27, 2007. – File Photo

RAWALPINDI: An anti-terrorism court was told on Saturday that Benazir Bhutto was killed because she supported the Lal Masjid operation.

Magistrate Taufiq Ahmed, who had recorded confessional statements of Rafaqat Hussain, Husnain Gul and Aitzaz Shah on Feb 13, 2008, said the accused told him that they wanted to kill only Ms Bhutto and because of the deaths of 23 other people in the attack, which they regretted, they would accept any punishment awarded to them.

During the hearing of the Benazir assassination case in Adiala Jail, the magistrate read out the confessional statements before ATC Judge Shahid Rafique.

According to the statements, the accused received Rs360,000 from Baitullah Mehsood while his associates, Abdullah alias Saddam and Qari Ismail, provided them two suicide bombers Saeed alias Bilal and Ikramullah.

They purchased a pistol to be used by the suicide attacker because the plan was to kill Ms Bhutto near the stage during her rally in Liaqat Bagh on Dec 27, 2007.

The accused, along with the suicide bomber, visited the venue on the night before the rally and took him to their residence in Quaid-i-Azam Colony in Rawalpindi.

The accused brought the bomber to the venue early in the morning only to learn that because of tight security arrangements, it was difficult to get inside and near the stage. Then they deployed the bomber in front of the gate of Liaqat Bagh and another attacker Ikramullah at another exit point.

After carrying out the crime, the accused reassembled near Fawara Chowk, Raja Bazar, and later went to their residence.

The magistrate, who is a prosecution witness, could not answer a few questions raised during cross-examination by defence counsel Naseer Tanoli related to the arrest of juvenile Aitzaz Shah and remand of the accused.

Senior public prosecutor of the Federal Investigation Agency, Chaudhry Zulfiqar Ali, produced another witness (Usman Maftoon of a private cellular company – Warid) who submitted to the court phone call record of the accused, according to which they were at Liaqat Bagh at the time of the attack.

Meanwhile, the same court also took up an application filed by Sehba Musharraf against court orders for the seizure of the property of her husband, former president Gen (retd) Pervez Musharraf.

FIA prosecutor Chaudhry Zulfiqar Ali raised a number of objections on the power of attorney of her newly-engaged counsel, Ilyas Siddiqui.

He said there was not a single signature of Ms Musharraf on the document, it was not duly notarised and consularised and could not establish that it was filed on her behalf.

The court directed Advocate Siddiqui to remove objections and adjourned the case to Feb 18.

Opinion

Editorial

Another overture
Updated 07 Aug, 2024

Another overture

Engagement is the only way that mistrust between Islamabad and Delhi can be overcome.
Tailored laws
07 Aug, 2024

Tailored laws

FOR the umpteenth time in the last two years, the legislature has been used to impose the will of the powerful on ...
Power sector talk
07 Aug, 2024

Power sector talk

THAT the energy sector is in a deep mess and is pulling down the moribund national economy further is a reality....
Hasina’s fall
Updated 06 Aug, 2024

Hasina’s fall

In Sheikh Hasina’s fall lie lessons for all developing states, particularly those in South Asia, which share many sociopolitical traits with Bangladesh.
Right-sizing
06 Aug, 2024

Right-sizing

THE long-awaited move to slash the size of the federal government in line with the stipulations of the 18th ...
Roads and rains
06 Aug, 2024

Roads and rains

PROPER urban drainage was long considered an infrastructural issue that was supposed to be dealt with by the civic...