Obama aide: drone strikes are legal, ethical

Published
0

White House counter-terrorism adviser John Brennan speaks during the daily press briefing in the Brady Press Briefing Room of the White House in Washington, DC.  - AFP photo

WASHINGTON: US President Barack Obama has ordered more openness about the secretive drone war pounding     al Qaeda in Pakistan, a top official said Monday, mounting the firmest defense yet of the program.

In a landmark speech on counter-terrorism “ethics”, Obama aide John Brennan insisted the program, the source of sharp tensions between Washington and Islamabad, was legal, ethical, proportional and saved US lives.

The top counter-terrorism official gave the most detailed justification and description of the drone program yet, on the eve of the anniversary of the killing of al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden in a raid in Pakistan by elite special forces.

US officials have generally been loath to publicly discuss the secretive CIA program, which has seen scores of what the US government says are al Qaeda suspects killed in tribal areas of Pakistan and some other nations.

“Broadly speaking, the debate over strikes targeted at individual members of al Qaeda has centered on their legality, their ethics, the wisdom of using them, and the standards by which they are approved,” Brennan said.

“The United States government conducts targeted strikes against specific al Qaeda terrorists, sometimes using remotely piloted aircraft, often referred to publicly as drones,” Brennan said in a speech to the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars in Washington.

“I'm here today because President Obama has instructed us to be more open with the American people about these efforts.” Brennan said the strikes had been certified as complying with US law by US Attorney General Eric Holder, among other top officials.

“The constitution empowers the president to protect the nation from any imminent threat of attack,” Brennan said, adding that Obama's action was also authorized by measures passed by Congress after the September 11 attacks in 2001.

He also argued that the strikes were ethical, proportional and conformed to US efforts to spare innocent civilians from being caught up in the crossfire.

“It is hard to imagine a tool that can better minimize the risk to civilians than remotely piloted aircraft,” Brennan said, in a speech briefly interrupted by a Code Pink anti-war protestor.

“There is absolutely nothing casual about the extraordinary care we take in making the decision to pursue an al Qaeda terrorist, and the lengths to which we go to ensure precision and avoid the loss of innocent life.”

Opinion

Editorial

Governance test
Updated 15 Aug, 2026

Governance test

EVER since the interior minister called for smaller administrative units to improve governance, the question of new...
Sailors’ killing
15 Aug, 2026

Sailors’ killing

THE killing of at least three Pakistani sailors in an apparent Houthi attack targeting a vessel in the waters of Bab...
Lethal celebrations
15 Aug, 2026

Lethal celebrations

IT is a familiar tale. Every year, occasions for national celebration turn into fear and mourning just because some...
Taliban support
Updated 14 Aug, 2026

Taliban support

THE latest UN monitoring report analysing the activities of several transnational terrorist groups is unequivocal in...
Job policy for youth
14 Aug, 2026

Job policy for youth

STRIPPED of its rhetoric, the prime minister’s announcement of Pakistan’s first National Youth Employment Policy...
Jail improvements
14 Aug, 2026

Jail improvements

THE Punjab government is spending Rs5bn on modernising jail facilities in the province, but to what end? The...