Drone strikes

Published May 30, 2012

EVEN as Pakistan and the US try to negotiate their way into a workable relationship, American drone strikes continue. The last few days have seen a flurry of attacks, with five strikes following the Nato summit at which the two countries failed to reach a deal on Isaf supply routes. Coming after Pakistani lawmakers called for their “immediate cessation”, this is a snub that implies America respects neither Pakistan’s sovereignty nor the democracy it claims it wants to see flourish. More pragmatically, the continuing attacks are making progress on the relationship that much more difficult. Parliament’s position could have been taken as a starting point from which to bargain. Pakistan has recognised the value of drone strikes in taking out some of its own enemies. A coordinated mechanism could be worked out in which Pakistan is given a role in the programme — which should also help minimise civilian casualties — in exchange for a promise not to disrupt strikes that target known militants. But as long as drone attacks remain a bone of contention between the two governments, continuing them only makes it harder to move forward with negotiations and gives Pakistani hardliners reason not to support a rapprochement and to incite already inflamed anti-Americanism. This isn’t just a matter of a few hundred people protesting in the streets; it constricts the space available for parliament and the government to talk to the US.

Reports emerging from within the US administration indicate that it is not just Pakistanis who question these attacks. The outgoing ambassador to Pakistan, Cameron Munter, appears to have disapproved of the handling of the programme here, and the Western media had earlier reported that the State Department is not as enthusiastic about it as the CIA. And despite reports that President Obama himself approves many targets, in Pakistan drones also seem to hit those simply found in suspicious locations or around known militants. The tool is a deeply controversial one, and proceeding with disregard for Pakistani opinion will only make it more difficult to incorporate it into a functional US-Pakistan relationship.

Opinion

Editorial

Punishing evaders
02 May, 2024

Punishing evaders

THE FBR’s decision to block mobile phone connections of more than half a million individuals who did not file...
Engaging Riyadh
02 May, 2024

Engaging Riyadh

OVER the last few weeks, there have been several exchanges involving top officials and their Saudi counterparts. At...
Freedom to question
02 May, 2024

Freedom to question

WITH frequently suspended freedoms, increasing violence and few to speak out for the oppressed, it is unlikely that...
Wheat protests
Updated 01 May, 2024

Wheat protests

The government should withdraw from the wheat trade gradually, replacing the existing market support mechanism with an effective new one over the next several years.
Polio drive
01 May, 2024

Polio drive

THE year’s fourth polio drive has kicked off across Pakistan, with the aim to immunise more than 24m children ...
Workers’ struggle
Updated 01 May, 2024

Workers’ struggle

Yet the struggle to secure a living wage — and decent working conditions — for the toiling masses must continue.