What happened to Fauzia from admission till her death?

Deceased PPP leader Fauzia Wahab. — Photo by APP
LAHORE, July 16: The management of a Karachi-based private hospital, Orthopaedic and Medical Institution (OMI), has described “cardio respiratory arrest due to septicaemia and multi-organ failure” as the prime cause of death of senior PPP leader Fauzia Wahab during her treatment at the health facility.
The OMI has submitted its detailed version titled ‘medical summary’ to the PMDC, defending its position amid allegations of medical negligence in Ms Wahab’s case.
This is the first complete clinical assessment and treatment process to surface after the death of 55-year-old Ms Wahab that incited a countrywide debate on the alleged medical negligence of top OMI surgeons, physicians and consultants.
The Disciplinary Committee of the Pakistan Medical and Dental Council (PMDC) is looking into this case of alleged medical negligence, which led to death of a prominent political leader on June 17. The summary was presented at the meeting of the Disciplinary Committee of the PMDC in Islamabad on July 9.
Chaired by senior lawyer Barrister Aitzaz Ahsan, the committee has directed the officials to issue notices to all medics besides other staff who provided treatment to Ms Wahab at OMI.
Dawn obtained a copy of the medical summary carrying details of multiple surgeries performed on Ms Wahab during her 23-day treatment, pre-and-post-operative aggressive care and follow-up treatment provided by leading surgeons, physicians besides diagnosis.
Submitted by OMI Director (Medical Services), the summary said Ms Wahab was admitted under care of Dr Badar Siddiqui on May 24 for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy, which was scheduled next day. Ultrasound of abdomen that was already done showed gall stones.
Pre-anaesthesia assessment was done by Dr Wajahat Malik (anaesthetist) who declared her fit for general anaesthesia.
Laparoscopy revealed an inflamed gall bladder, which had dense adhesions with duodenum and omentum. On separation of the omentum a fistula was found between the gall bladder and pylorus. At this point the consultant decided to convert to open procedure to securely close the fistula. Cholecystectomy was done and the fistula in the pyloric region was closed in layers with omental patch. A drain was placed in the sub-hepatic region and the surgical wound was closed. A complete surgical procedure was performed under general anaesthesia administered by Dr Wajahat.
Ms Wahab had an uneventful recovery from anaesthesia and was shifted to her room. She was mobilised in her room. She had problem in passing urine for which she was catheterised as advised by the consultant.
Ms Wahab was haemodyhnamically stable, but complained of epigastric pain on the evening of May 26 that was managed with analgestic injection according to the advice of the consultant. She was mobilised in her room during the last 24 hours.
At around 9pm on May 26 she collapsed and developed hypovolaemic shock. The consultant was informed immediately who ordered to shift her to ICU and to resuscitate her initially with plasma expanders and later with blood transfusion. Her blood pressure got stabilised and she was fully conscious and oriented.
Ultrasound of abdomen was done urgently that showed pockets of free fluid. At 1:30am on May 7 her abdomen became tense and her blood pressure began to fall. Diagnosis of intra-abdominal bleeding was done and emergency laparotomy was decided by the consultant.
Pre-anaesthesia assessment was again done by Dr Wajahat. Her family members were explained by the consultants about high risk of surgery due to her unstable condition. They agreed and gave their consent for emergency surgery.
Laparotomy was jointly performed by Dr Badar Siddiqui and Prof Shafiq-ur-Rehman under general anaesthesia. Free blood was found in the abdomen, which was cleared and the source of bleeding was searched. The operated areas namely Cystic Duct and Cystic Artery clips were found to be in position and secure. The suture line of the repair of the fistula was found to be satisfactory. The liver bed was examined and no evidence of gross bleeding was found. The bed was stitched.
Fresh blood was still found coming in the operative filed. Search was made on the left side and the blood was seen coming from Porta Hepatis from the left side from inside the liver. The consultants decided to pack the area and wait. After observing the area for 15 minutes the consultants decided to place two abdominal drains and the surgical wound was closed.
At least four units of blood and fresh frozen plasma were transfused during surgery. The patient was shifted back to ICU at 7am on May 27 and kept electively on mechanical ventilators as advised by the treating consultant.
Fresh blood was coming from the abdominal drains (about 800ml during the first eight hours after laparotomy). The bleeding did not settle despite multiple transfusions of blood and platelets. Post-operative tests revealed low haemoglobin and low platelet count with some derangement in the clotting profile.
Due to suspicion of bleeding disorder Dr Tahir Shamsi (haematologist) was called in for consultation. In his opinion the patient was developing DIC (Disseminated Intra-vascular Coagulation). He recommended that Factor VII (Novoseven) be given intravenously to avert the possibility of progression to full blown DIC. Factor VII was administered immediately as advised by the consultants and within two hours the drainage of blood was reduced to significant amount.
The patient was relatively better on the morning on May 28. Antibiotic regime was reviewed and post-operative management was continued under the guidance of Prof Tipu Sultan (consultant anaesthesiologist) and Prof Tasnim Ahsan (consultant physician & endocrinologist). Ultrasound of abdomen was repeated on the same day which showed no collection in the peritoneal cavity. The consultants decided to continue mechanical ventilation for another day and then to plan for removal of abdominal packs.
Prof Jaffer Naqvi (nephrologist) was also consulted as patient’s blood urea and creatinine started to rise.
Pre-anaesthesia assessment was done by Prof Tipu Sultan who explained the high risk involvement in the proposed surgery.
The patient was taken to operation theatre on May 29 for removal of abdominal packs which was jointly done by Dr Badar Siddiqui and Prof Shafiq-ur-Rehman under general anaesthesia this time administered by Prof Tipu.
The sutures were opened from the original incision. Abdominal packs were gently removed, the area was dry and no fresh bleeding was seen. The liver was found to have purple areas spread over both lobes, these signified areas of infarct. Two abdominal drains and a T-Tube was placed as a safety valve after which the surgical incision was closed.
The patient was shifted to ICU and the consultants decided that mechanical ventilation will be continued for the rest of the day.
By the evening the same day she was haemodynamically stable and drainage was settled. The patient’s condition and lab reports were satisfactory on the morning next day therefore Prof Tipu decided to start weaning off from ventilator which continued gradually under his guidance. Ventilator was disconnected and the patient was taken on T-Piece with oxygen at 9am on May 31.
She was breathing spontaneously and was maintaining satisfactory blood gasses. Her fever was not settling and pan cultures were inconclusive therefore antibiotics were reviewed again. She remained on T-Piece for the whole day and remained comfortable however it was decided to put her back on the ventilator overnight to prevent exhaustion.
The patient was extubated by the constant anaesthesiologist at 8:45am on June 1 and culture was sent from the endotracheal tube. However, to prevent exhaustion he decided to re-intubate the patient at 12:30pm on the same day and to start mechanical ventilation. Chest X-Ray was repeated which showed bilateral basal haziness therefore ultrasound of chest was done which showed mild to moderate bilateral pleural effusion.
Dr Mosavir Ansari (pulmonologist) was consulted who advised to continue antibiotics and ventilation as he was suspecting pneumonia. Ultrasound of chest was repeated on June 2. Ultrasound of abdomen was also done which did not reveal any new collection in the peritoneal cavity.
The patient remained stable on mechanical ventilator and the drainage was settled. Closed observation and aggressive post-operative management was continued accordingly. Weaning off from ventilator was again started from June 3. Tracheal secretions revealed growth of pseudomonas species therefore antibiotic regime was readjusted by the consultants according to the sensitivity report.
Intermittent T-Piece trials were continued for short periods to help in weaning off ventilator however they proved to be unsuccessful. Chest X-ray was repeated on June 4 which showed increase in bilateral haziness. As multiple trials to wean off from ventilator had failed and the patient had pneumonia the consultants decided to plan Tracheostomy which would help in weaning off from ventilator.
Family members were consulted regarding the need of Tracheostomy for which they agreed and gave their consent for another high-risk procedure. Tracheostomy was performed at 7pm on June 5 by Prof Tariq Rafi (consultant ENT surgeon) under general anaesthesia administered by Prof Tipu. The patient was shifted to ICU where mechanical ventilation was continued.
The patient was fully awake the next morning but was electively kept on ventilator due to pneumonia. The patient was comfortable on ventilator but her blood pressure started to rise therefore opinion was also taken from Dr Tahir Saghir (cardiologist). He revised the anti hypertensive therapy.
T-Piece trials were again given over the next two days but failed therefore mechanical ventilation was continued. The patient passed large amount of malaena on June 9 and became unstable. Intravenous Transamine and blood transfusion was given and the patient recovered in two to three hours. There was no further episode of malaena over the rest of the day. She again passed malaena at 12:30am next day after which two units of blood were transfused. She remained unstable all night despite sedation and continued ventilation.
Dr Zaigham Abbas (gastroenterologist) was consulted who visited the same day and advised conservative treatment.
The June 10 chest X-ray did not show any improvement therefore pulmonology opinion was taken from Dr Javed Warind who advised changes in antibiotic regime and ventilator settings. No episode of malaena was observed during rest of the day. The patient was showing signs of fluid retention in third space and lungs therefore I/V fluids were reduced and diuretic therapy was started next day as advised by the consultants.
Ultrasound of chest was repeated the same day which showed possible collapse/collection at left lung base. Ultrasound of abdomen was done which did not show evidence of any intra-eritoneal collection. The patient was kept sedated and mechanical ventilation was continued under the guidance of Prof Tipu.
The patient continued to retain fluid in the third space despite limiting fluid intake and administering diuretics therefore it was decided by the nephrologist that excess body fluid needs to be removed via ultra-filtration during haemodialysis.
The family was explained regarding need of haemodialysis for which they agreed and gave their consent. Haemodialysis was performed on June 13 and ultra-filtrate was removed as advised by the nephrologist. She was referred to Dr Badar Dhanani (dermatologist) for the management of perineal rashes and cellulitis on right hand.
Echocardiogram was done the next day which showed moderate mitral regurgitation, pulmonary artery hypertension and normal left ventricular function.
Haemodialysis with ultra-filtration was repeated on June 14. Caloric intake and doses of antibiotics were reviewed according to the patient’s renal status. Sedation was reduced slowly to let the patient be more awake in order to assess the possibility of weaning off from ventilator.
Input of infectious disease specialist Dr Naseem Salahuddin was also obtained on June 15 and June 16 during which ultra filtration was done as recommended by nephrologist.
The management of the patient was being overseen by a team of consultants along with input from relevant specialists as required.
Fauzia’s condition did not improve despite the aggressive treatment and her level of responsiveness decreased gradually therefore Dr Aziz Sonawala (consultant neurologist) was consulted on June 16 for neuronal dysfunction. Dr Sonawala then suggested MRI of brain which was done the same day under supervision of Prof Tipu.
A detailed counselling regarding patient’s extremely critical condition was done by Dr Badar and Prof Tipu the same day.
MRI of brain revealed brainstem and thalamic infarcts along with oedema. Dr Sonawala visited again on June 17 and after detailed examination concluded that clinically the patient had no response. He performed the 1st set of brainstem criteria which showed absence of all major reflexes. He advised to repeat the 2nd set of brainstem criteria after six hours and not to resuscitate. He spoke to patient’s family members in detail after which they agreed and consented for DNR supportive care protocol to be followed.
The 2nd set of brainstem was also negative after which detailed family counselling was done by the treating consultants and they were informed about brainstem death of Ms Wahab. The family then decided for systematic withdrawal of life support. The mechanical ventilation was continued on air.
“Ms Wahab’s condition continued to deteriorate and she expired at 8:10pm on June 17. The cause of death awas ascertained to be cardio respiratory arrest due to septicaemia and multi-organ failure,” the OMI management concluded.









In my opinion sudden death of such a renowned politician due to alleged negligence of some of the leading doctors of Pakistan again raise many doubts on the efficiency and effectiveness of the Private Hospitals of Pakistan. In my opinion there is some inherent conflict between maximizing profits and saving lives of patients. It is a high time that people at the helm of affairs should come forward and strengthen the regulatory mechanism for the hospital sector so that a socially and ethically responsible hospital sector can be established
I think sudden death of such a renowned politican in a private hospital due to alleged negligence of some of the best doctors of Pakistan raise lot of questions and doubts on the effectiveness of working of hospital sector of Pakistan. I think it is the high time that Federal and Provincial Govt, should take immediate measures to strengthen the regulatory framework of the hospitals and make them more responsible
Dear All,
having read the comments, I see there is an active debate going on. Yes, Madam Fauzia was given the best care by the hospital and all the consultants after the mess up that had been created. for 38 hours she was internally bleeding. The surgeon, Badar Siddiqi screwed up big time and used fistula and all that adhesion related stuff as a fall back!!! You can do all sort of patch work, but patch works do not work in a human body. Off course, everyone has his/her time, but one has to see the practices in place. Dont you think she was capable of going abroad? But she did believe in the services of the hospitals and doctors. She was sadly mistaken!
The criminal negligence is in the first 38 hours. After that it is all good work. But that good work couldnt save her life.
YOU WOULD BE MISSED.
What an immature comment from Maher. Like mentioned earlier these are possible surgical complications. We can only try, well being is in Allah's hand. RIP
I don't think an autopsy was done on her. Was it?
Part 4:
Mistake #4: Why choose OMI for surgery and not say AKU hospital? Private clinics are notorious for profiteering. Their specialists work at a number of other clinics, are in a hurry to handle as many patients as available and don’t give time for adequate patient care. It is apparent that OMI specialists are also trying to hide their inappropriate patient management by frequently citing that they obtained Fauzia’s loved ones consent.
In my opinion, the laparoscopic surgeon (Dr. Badar Siddiqi?) initiated the sequence of events, compounded by poor infection control (Pseudomonas) and multiple surgeries that ultimately lead to Fauzia’s death.
Part 3:
Mistake #2: Multiple surgeries and other extensive manipulations, when the patient is already bleeding, are a big no-no until the patient has stabilized.
Heavy loss of blood in Fauzia due to injury to blood vessels in porta hepatis affected the liver function. Liver, for example, makes chemicals that clot the blood and defense molecules (‘antibodies’) that protect from infection; it also removes toxins from blood.
Mistake #3: The OMI appears to have a very poor infection cognizance and control in place. This is evident from the fact that no doctor/nursing precautions existed or Fauzia wouldn’t have developed Pseudomonal infection and that Infection specialist was called in almost 2 weeks after Pseudomonas was discovered in respiratory secretions.
Pseudomonal infection might have come from the urinary catheter that Fauzia was fitted with or poor ventilator maintenance. Regardless of the source, Pseudomonal infection is by itself sufficient to cause kidney failure, as evident from Fauzia’s raised chemicals that indicate this failure; and brain death as evident from MRI results.
Part 2:
Mistake #1: Based on previous ultrasound findings (presence of adhesions, etc.), the laparoscopic surgeon (IF he read the report) should have known that Fauzia must not undergo removal of gall bladder by laparoscope but by open surgery.
I believe the surgeon either did not close the hole in the intestine properly or punctured it at another place. This caused dangerous inflammation of the membrane (‘peritonitis’) that covers the intestines, as was evident by Fauzia’s tense abdomen. Also, either the drain that he placed or he himself may have injured (‘iatrogenic’) the blood vessels, which lie very close to gall bladder, on the under surface of liver (in the ‘porta hepatis’); hence free fluid and blood in Fauzia’s abdomen.
Part 1:
I was shocked by such a tragic departure of a vibrant and committed Fauzia Wahab. This moved me to try to explain in lay terms as to what I think may have happened here:
Pseudomonas bacteria that were present in Fauzia's respiratory secretions are so-called opportunistic bacteria that can cause life-threatening infections in patients whose defense mechanisms have become quite weak ('immunocompromised'); they don't make healthy people sick. In all cases, these bacteria are acquired by patients in a hospital setting (‘nosocomial’). Hospital environment makes these bacteria strong and resistant to antibiotics. The cell walls of Pseudomonas (and other similar bacteria called 'Gram-negative' bacteria) contain a toxin (‘endotoxin’), which is released, when these bacteria die. So, while antibiotics that are used in Pseudomonal infections kill the bacteria, they don’t do anything to the toxins. The effects of these toxins, if not properly managed, may be fatal.
Damage to blood vessel at port hepatis in initial operation which lead to post operative bleeding and hepatic infarct(purple spots on liver in second look op).No diagnotic or therapeutic angiography to find and secure the bleeding point.
Massive blood transfusion,infection in ICU setup lead to DIC &MOF
Surgeon from Australia
She was a eminent speaker and a very friendly face. She came accross to me as a very well mannered person with values and honesty. All I would say, with all the wills in the world if your time is up then its up. There is nothng in the world we can do to change that fate. We need to wait for a detailed outcome of this report. I am it would be discussed among a team of specialists. so we need to wait. In the mean while lets us all pray for the departed soul. May Allah SWT, give her jenna and may she rest in paradise. Ameen. Give the family the courage to bear this tragic loss.
May her soul rest in Peace.
I am not in a favor to publish this medical report.
There is no question of medical negligence on the part of the OMI as a matter of fact they probably gave more attention to this patient knowing who she was.
Did any one know what the main problem was.An expert for everything seemed to have been summoned, Blood pressure control, resusitation, managing fluid balance are everyday occurances and ITU staff should be competent with these problems. It appears that there were too many cooks not knowing what the main problems were.
Ina Lillah he wa ina ilaihe rajioun.
Indeed we are for Allah and towards Him is the journey going to end.
What ever the technicalities are involved in this case, and what ever the out come of the investigations may be. One question irks me. In the medically most advanced countries, it happens so many times, not always, that a physician is blamed and accordingly punished or disciplined. It must be the highest level of medical science being practiced in Pakistan, that we never hear a doctor being punished or disciplined. They must be doing doing EVERY thing by the book. We are so lucky.