Intertwined paths
EVERY trite analogy has been attempted. Pakistan and the US are a couple trapped in a bad marriage. Pakistan and the US are emotional friends who cannot quite believe the other has let them down over and over again. Pakistan and the US are frustrated and sullen partners who blame each other for the major failings in their own lives. But perhaps the explanation closest to reality comes from within the world of international relations: Pakistan and the US have diverging interests as defined by their respective national-security establishments, but circumstances dictate that the two countries cannot go their separate ways. Which is why they clash so frequently — another démarche against drone strikes was handed over by the foreign ministry to the US embassy in Islamabad on Thursday, for example — but never quite manage to break off all ties — the Glocs-cum-apology deal took many months to resolve but few ever doubted that a deal would eventually be reached.
For the US, Pakistan, in the ultimate analysis, matters for four reasons: the war in Afghanistan has to be wound down and a modicum of post-war stability established, in which Pakistan will have a major role to play either as facilitator or spoiler; Pakistan has a large Muslim population that is important to America’s relations with the Muslim world; Pakistan has nuclear weapons; and Pakistan has groups of terrorists and militants with anti-West agendas. None of those reasons are positive. There is no promising trade or common security opportunity that the US is hoping to take advantage of through better relations with Pakistan. It is a fear-based relationship — if not handled properly, to what extent can Pakistan undermine US national interests? — and that fear has only grown in recent years. The pragmatism that underpins the approach, however (engagement may not have worked terribly well but isolation of Pakistan will provide no answers either, according to influential policy circles in the US), ensures that fear has not spilled over into irrational behaviour. But as the need for an orderly exit from Afghanistan becomes more pressing, there’s every possibility that fresh tensions between Pakistan and the US will erupt and may not be managed well in the compressed exit timeline.
On the Pakistani side, there is an unspoken consensus across the military and civilian divide that when push comes to shove, Pakistan cannot afford, economically or diplomatically, to cut off ties with the US and by extension with the outside world. While that ought to be the starting point, it is rarely carried through to its logical conclusion: do what is right and necessary to keep Pakistan stable and secure.









Excellent analysis. Dawn has advocated ideas on these lines for a long time. We can only hope the two parties pay heed.
Very pertinent analysis apart from the strange and defeatist assumption that for Pakistan the outside world can be only the UAS.. One knows that here everything and everybody is dispensable except the vital self-interests.
In this editorial Dawn highlighted something very important that has to understand the people of Pakistan. As USA need Pakistan similarly Pakistan Need USA as a close ally.
But unfortunately since last 65 year all governments of Pakistan keep on colleting funds from world and most of these funds and aids are not used for the development of Pakistan or the People of Pakistan, because of this huge level of corruption most of friend of Pakistan loose the trust on the Pakistanis.
If USA or other countries giving aid to Pakistan they have clear agenda or there interests but Pakistani Politician and Government nether delivering any thing to the People of Pakistan nor have potential to reduce corruption in the country and they still do not have any clear vision for developing the country. That is why the can not show courage to talk and highlighted the real issues of Pakistan such as Power, health, water and most importantly security
All Politician and Government of Pakistan have great potential but now there is need to be all of them try to be honest, sincere loyal to the Pakistan and build a positive image of Pakistan and its authorities so that friends of Pakistan such as USA step forward to help Pakistan without any doubt.
But why?