Intertwined paths

Published August 25, 2012

EVERY trite analogy has been attempted. Pakistan and the US are a couple trapped in a bad marriage. Pakistan and the US are emotional friends who cannot quite believe the other has let them down over and over again. Pakistan and the US are frustrated and sullen partners who blame each other for the major failings in their own lives. But perhaps the explanation closest to reality comes from within the world of international relations: Pakistan and the US have diverging interests as defined by their respective national-security establishments, but circumstances dictate that the two countries cannot go their separate ways. Which is why they clash so frequently — another démarche against drone strikes was handed over by the foreign ministry to the US embassy in Islamabad on Thursday, for example — but never quite manage to break off all ties — the Glocs-cum-apology deal took many months to resolve but few ever doubted that a deal would eventually be reached.

For the US, Pakistan, in the ultimate analysis, matters for four reasons: the war in Afghanistan has to be wound down and a modicum of post-war stability established, in which Pakistan will have a major role to play either as facilitator or spoiler; Pakistan has a large Muslim population that is important to America’s relations with the Muslim world; Pakistan has nuclear weapons; and Pakistan has groups of terrorists and militants with anti-West agendas. None of those reasons are positive. There is no promising trade or common security opportunity that the US is hoping to take advantage of through better relations with Pakistan. It is a fear-based relationship — if not handled properly, to what extent can Pakistan undermine US national interests? — and that fear has only grown in recent years. The pragmatism that underpins the approach, however (engagement may not have worked terribly well but isolation of Pakistan will provide no answers either, according to influential policy circles in the US), ensures that fear has not spilled over into irrational behaviour. But as the need for an orderly exit from Afghanistan becomes more pressing, there’s every possibility that fresh tensions between Pakistan and the US will erupt and may not be managed well in the compressed exit timeline.

On the Pakistani side, there is an unspoken consensus across the military and civilian divide that when push comes to shove, Pakistan cannot afford, economically or diplomatically, to cut off ties with the US and by extension with the outside world. While that ought to be the starting point, it is rarely carried through to its logical conclusion: do what is right and necessary to keep Pakistan stable and secure.

Opinion

Editorial

Doctor attacked
09 Jun, 2026

Doctor attacked

AN act of reprehensible violence has shaken the medical community. On Saturday, an employee of the Provincial Civil...
AJK flare-up
Updated 09 Jun, 2026

AJK flare-up

The situation started deteriorating after a trader affiliated with the JAAC was reportedly shot in an altercation with law-enforcers.
Fault lines
09 Jun, 2026

Fault lines

THE April 8 ceasefire that halted hostilities between Israel and Iran has encountered its most serious test yet....
Soft on traders
08 Jun, 2026

Soft on traders

THE Fixed Tax Asaan Scheme for traders with an annual turnover of up to Rs200m has been designed as a ‘pragmatic...
Ceasefire in name
Updated 08 Jun, 2026

Ceasefire in name

Both sides accuse the other of violating the truce that was supposed to halt the conflict in April, yet neither appears willing to abandon negotiations altogether.
Damaged childhoods
08 Jun, 2026

Damaged childhoods

CHILD abuse is so prevalent that the UN ranked Pakistan as the least safe country for children. Even so, more than...