… And the abyss stared back
It’s official: We are not a nation. We are a mob.
All those ‘think positive’ types waiting for some kind of a ‘moderate Muslim awakening’ in this country are simply deluding themselves.
No amount of your egos, resources and ‘positiveness’ invested in ‘moderatism’ such as interfaith dialogues, Sufi music, lectures by ‘moderate clerics and Islamic scholars’, and your insistence on how peaceful our faith truly is, all this won’t make an iota of a difference.
You are fighting a battle that you have already lost; simply because all the mindless violence in the name of faith in this country has been tolerated for too long, sometimes even rewarded.
Thus, who should the mad mob which loots, burns, plunders and kills in the name of God and his messenger be afraid of? Not the police, not the courts, not the media, not the government and believe me, not even the Almighty himself!
Why should they? How can they when such mobs and those who fire them up have all been playing God themselves – judging, condemning and executing everyone and everything they deem ‘unIslamic’, heretical, blasphemous and infidel, without fear, remorse, or any chance of ever being reprimanded.
This faith-driven madness is not a recent happening. It’s been accumulating for decades.
And every time it has reared its ugly head in the shape of belligerent mob violence, it has not been dealt with the help of the law but with words and gestures that actually end up justifying it.
__________________________
In 1954 the former Chief Minister of Punjab, Mumtaz Daultana, after failing to solve the problem of food shortages and unemployment in the province, encouraged rabid hordes belonging to the Jamat-e-Islami (JI) to instigate anti-Ahmadi violence just to divert the people’s anger from his failing ministership.
Though Daultana was ultimately removed from his post, soon after the commotion all those arrested for instigating the violence, damaging public property and attacking members of the Ahmadi community were released unconditionally.
Then in 1974, the popularly elected Prime Minister, Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto, capitulated like a man made from jelly when the JI used another round of anti-Ahmadi violence in Punjab as a way to reignite its failing fortunes and ask Bhutto to declare the besieged community as non-Muslim.
Instead of condemning mob violence, Bhutto, the great progressive democrat, did exactly what the mob demanded. As if overnight the Ahmadi community that had played a major role in the creation of Pakistan and was one of the most vigorous contributors to the new country’s economy, was reduced to becoming second-class citizens.
How many Pakistanis questioned Bhutto’s cynical move or JI’s politics of hate? None.
All that the reactionary Ziaul Haq dictatorship (1977-88) had to do was to turn such politics of hate into actual state policy, thus beginning the now consolidated Pakistani tradition of churning out a continuous flow of blood-thirsty sectarian and Islamist outfits.
But more dangerously, these policies eventually generated an ethos that promised material, political and spiritual rewards and benefits for anyone willing to become violent, self-righteous, exhibitionist and hypocritical in matters of faith.
However, once the great tyrant and mastermind of this mindset blew up somewhere over Bhawalpur in August 1988, did the democrats that replaced him reverse the tide?
Not quite.
In 1995, late Benazir Bhutto’s Interior Minister, Naseerullah Babar, was busy sitting with ISI sleuths conceiving the creation of a dreadful and barbaric force that became to be known as the Taliban.
They said they were doing this to ‘end the civil war in Afghanistan and stabilise the region,’ all the while turning a blind eye to all the atrocities being committed by their creations once they took power in Kabul.
It was thus ironic that when Benazir was brutally killed in December 2007, the killers had used the services of Pakistani Islamists who had in turn been inspired by the same Taliban that Benazir Bhutto’s interior ministry had created with the help of Saudi money and ISI expertise.
Meanwhile, the other great democrat of the 1990s, Mian Nawaz Sharif, till even about 1996, was passionately leading emotional processions to Ziaul Haq’s grave site in Islamabad and promising to ‘continue Shaheed Zia’s mission.’
Though he finally faced a few assassination attempts by members of a sectarian organisation in Punjab in the late 1990s, this didn’t stop some of his party members to hold hands with leaders of the same banned organisation in 2009!
The so-called moderates let out a sigh of relief when a military gung-ho, General Pervez Musharraf, toppled Nawaz and positioned himself as a Pakistani Attaturk.
But he would go on to only tweak the Ziaist mindset by adding to it a fresh dose of schizophrenia. Patronising material modernism, he, at the same time, fattened terrorist outfits seen as ‘friendly’ to the Pakistan military’s ‘strategic goals’ in the region, while attacking the less friendly ones so his regime could continue getting and gobbling military and economic aid from the United States in its war on terror.
This schizoid disposition not only furthered the cause and cancer of moral and material hypocrisy already ripe in the society ever since the Zia days, it is exactly the kind of societal, cultural and political schizophrenia that became the grounds on which Pakistan’s newer, freer and louder electronic media actually began building its repertoire on.
It was this media that turned armed thugs who, in 2005, had taken over a mosque and a seminary in Islamabad, into heroes.
Even though the Musharraf dictatorship had taken its sweet time to crack down on the thugs who had been harassing the city for weeks, when the crackdown finally came, TV news reporters and anchormen transformed into becoming angry, foaming mouthpieces of the thugs, enough for the Musharraf regime to not only release most of the arrested men, but to actually provide funds and helicopters to the funeral arrangements of the self-proclaimed soldiers of God.
It is also the same schizoid mindset that has given a sudden raise to the profile of men like Imran Khan. He can sound like an impassioned fusion of Chairman Mao, Z A. Bhutto, Abul Ala Maududi and the myopic mullah of your neighborhood mosque within a span of just a few sentences!
So, whom should a mob setting out to lynch a ‘blasphemer’, or to loot, burn and plunder the city in the fine name of Allah and his last prophet be afraid of? Why should they have any reason to be ashamed of?
Imagine now, after last Friday’s ugly violence when a young member of a mob would have come back home after a day of looting, burning and killing, and he must have switched on his TV.
Do you think he would have done so because he expected to hear blunt condemnation of his actions from the media and the politicians? No.
What he must have seen and heard on the idiot box were TV anchors, talk-show hosts, journalists, religious leaders, ‘experts’ and politicians, all shouting at the top of their voices and simultaneously trying to convince their audience how much more ‘ashiq (lovers) of the prophet’ they were than the next guy.
Our young mob member would have then reclined on his sofa, or chair or whatever, smug in his belief that it was he who was the biggest lover of the prophet. Unlike the talking heads he saw swearing their Ishq for Allah’s last messenger; it was him who went out to express it on the roads. But the only problem was that this raving idiot’s expression in this respect included burning, plundering and even killing.
We as a nation have for long been staring into the abyss. But what many of us believe is a vision of some kind of a Muslim reawakening is in actuality just the abyss staring right back.
As a sad Sufi would observe, in our pursuit to become one with the Almighty, we have instead become one with the abyss.
Nadeem F. Paracha is a cultural critic and senior columnist for Dawn Newspaper and Dawn.com
The views expressed by this blogger and in the following reader comments do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Dawn Media Group.









So~~~~~~am i to conclude that in Pakistan , religion is not working ?
In theory religion should be a force for good. In actual practice it continues relentlessly to be the just the opposite .
I generally don’t always agree with NFP but this article is so unbiased and spot on the root issues.
The problem with media (and the most of the writers) is that they either have deliberately closed their eyes and have opened a part of them just to look at the violent incidents. If you turn around and look around honestly, most of the protests were peaceful that were nowhere shown on the media. A few violent protests, which are only 5% – 7% of the total, don’t justify to call a nation a mob !
For God sake, be honest with yourself. I won’t say “be honest with the country”, because your actions make up your own character. And because you are the people who got a chance to raise a voice, to spread some message or information, you will strictly be asked in the next world about what you told to people.
So, to be honest to yourself, be honest to others, thanks.
Dear writer, if some people (numbering hardly 0.05% of total protestors nationwide), had already planned the day earlier to cause mischief in the name of Prophet (pbuh) for their material gains, then it is not the protestors fault. Most or almost all of the violence was reported in major cities like Karachi, Lahore, Islamabad, Peshawar. Tires were burnt (at the max) in many other cities. No person from JI, PTI, MQM, or any other religious party (shia or sunni) was allowed to throw a stone or damage property. Absolutely not a fan of Hafiz Saeed & his views but the rally that he lead, didn’t hurl a single stone. If Pakistan is burned, torched, looted, destroyed after Benazir Bhutto is assasinated, this doesn’t mean that she had this gigantic number of “aashiqaans” or “jaan nisaars” out there burning property, carrying away ATM’s, raping girls who could not reach home due to non availability of transport etc. You sir, know better than me that they are opportunity seekers waiting for any suitable time to get down and dirty. Calling such demons as real protestors is maligning actual peaceful protestors and the cause itself and a horrible generalization. Clearly, the population you discussed in the article is on one extreme, but you sir, with due respect are also not on a neutral or unbiased viewpoint, you are also on another extreme.
The writer has not said anything that we all are not aware of, pointing out the problem is the easiest bit …… what is the solution? Or is there one? We all, the writer and the people who have commented on this piece (including myself) and the entire intellect of Pakistan that sit in the drawing room and discuss how bad things have become my question to them is, how many times have you actually gone out and voted in your lives? Some of you may be young and the others never cared! One who are young it is time for you to bring the change and let the process continue. So what if Zardari comes back to power …. as long as it is as per the due process. Time will take us out of this chaos ….. In my opinion the process has to continue …… we will have to vote for the best available candidate and with time things will fall in their place. And that time may not happen in your or my life time but if our will is strong enough our children will live in a better country.
I know what we need! We need a revolution, like the 1917 revolution in Russia. Ban all religions. Beat this religious crap out of mullahs and whole society.
Hope that answers your question.
Pakistanis ran away from the Hindus to form a nation that would protect them. But little did they realize that their own kind would consume them in just 60 years.
Only about 7% ran away from Hindus. Chased away the Hindus would be more appropriate.
Would have been worse with the Hindus, trust me. Might have taken less than 60 years.
First they came for the communists, and I did not speak out – because I was not a communist;
Then they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out – because I was not a socialist;
Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out – because I was not a trade unionist;
Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out – because I was not a Jew;
Then they came for me – and there was no one left to speak out for me.
Martin Niemoller
Pakistan is truly staring at the abyss and until we realize and face the wrongs we have done as a nation, there can be no moving in the right direction. My sincere apologies as a Pakistani to Ahmadis, Christians, Hindus, Parsis and all minorities for the treatment given to them. Shameful how every Pakistani has to sign on their passport application that they believe Ahmadis are non-muslims. This is what we get for breeding hate. When they come to burn my house down because I don’t have a beard or wasn’t seen at prayers 5 times a day there will certainly be no one left to stand up for me.
One piece of advice bro….. never feel sorry for acknowledging or stating a fact. There is nothing wrong in calling apples apples. If your passport requires acknowledging that summers are hot and winters are cold………. what’s wrong in approving that, when it’s a win-win situation for all… you get your passport and all legal formalities are satisfied as well.
I think we should start apologizing more loudly to all these minorities. That would be a good start.
I have only read the first line of your piece, as yet and I am so grateful that you have said what you have. I’ve been saying this for some time now, but when you say it, it means more..! OK going back to read the rest!
Very well written and worthy of a larger debate.