Israeli army refused to follow Netanyahu’s order to attack Iran in 2010: paper

Published
0

NEW YORK, Nov 5: Israel’s hawkish Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had ordered security forces to prepare for an attack on Iran’s nuclear facilities in 2010, but his military chief and head of the intelligence agency refused to follow orders, calling the move “illegal” and akin to “stealing a war”.

Israeli Defence Minister Ehud Barak was part of the plan.

Citing an investigative report by an Israeli channel, The New York Times said on Monday that the military chief and the top spy of Israel vehemently opposed the move that could have brought the two countries on the verge of war.

At the end of a meeting of the forum of seven senior government ministers in 2010, which the then Chief of Staff Gabi Ashkenazi and former Mossad chief Meir Dagan attended, Netanyahu gave an order to raise the level of preparation of Israel's security apparatus to prepare for a military strike.

The Times said the report, by the respected investigative journalist Ilana Dayan, came in the form of a promotional preview for an hour-long documentary about Israel’s decision-making process regarding Iran. Ms Dayan said Netanyahu, in a meeting with a small circle of top ministers, turned to Gabi Ashkenazi and told him to “set the systems for P-plus,” a term meaning that an operation would start soon.

The investigation by the Channel 2 programme Uvda (Fact), Dagan came out sharply against the attack on Iran telling Netanyahu and Defence Minister Ehud Barak, “You are likely to make an illegal decision to go to war. Only the cabinet is authorised to decide this.”

Meanwhile, associates of Ashkenazi reportedly said the former Israel Defence Forces (IDF) chief was concerned that raising the alert level would “create new facts on the ground”, leading to a war.

Barak in an interview to the channel said that Ashkenazi responded to Netanyahu at the time saying that the IDF was not ready and that he did not have the operational capacity to carry out the order.

The Defence Minister claims in the interview that in contrast to Ashkenazi and Dagan's positions, raising the alert level to “P Plus” does not necessarily entail going to war.

“The things that you are describing are the responsibility of the government. The idea that if the (IDF) chief of staff does not recommend something that is possible to do, then we cannot decide to carry it out as this has no basis in fact,” he said.

Opinion

Editorial

Without consequence
Updated 02 Nov, 2026

Without consequence

From drone attacks to online harassment and legal intimidation, the methods of silencing reporters are multiplying, with little fear of punishment.
Climate diagnosis
02 Nov, 2026

Climate diagnosis

THE Lancet Countdown’s latest findings should change how Pakistan thinks about illness as much as how it thinks...
Fighting harassment
02 Nov, 2026

Fighting harassment

WORKPLACE harassment is often narrowly defined as sexual misconduct. A resolution passed by the National Assembly on...
Cost of provinces
Updated 01 Nov, 2026

Cost of provinces

Political parties demanding new provinces must explain how they intend to pay for them and what improvements citizens can expect.
Exchange hack
01 Nov, 2026

Exchange hack

ON Thursday, the largest cryptocurrency heist in history saw some $6.3bn drained from exchange platform Binance’s...
Cyber safety
Updated 01 Nov, 2026

Cyber safety

The state of freedom of expression in Pakistan is already quite poor, so any further attempts to clamp down on free speech must be resisted.