D-8 summit

Published November 23, 2012

AS the D-8 summit was held in Islamabad yesterday, people were wondering what the many supranational groupings of which Pakistan is a member have achieved over the decades. The most glaring example is that of the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation which was formed in Dhaka in 1985. Saarc has done little that can be considered a step towards greater economic and cultural cooperation among the member states. Unfortunately, despite yesterday’s adoption of the D-8 charter and pledges to work for closer economic ties and peace, democracy and tolerance, this grouping too, has little to show. Established 15 years ago, D-8 has done nothing except hold periodic conferences, even though the member-states are rich in human and natural resources. The eighth summit brought together five government heads, while Bangladesh, Egypt and Malaysia chose to send their representatives. Sheikh Hasina Wajed’s absence, apparently because of differences with Islamabad, was understandable — though regrettable. Mohamed Morsi’s decision not to attend was also disappointing. Many people were looking forward to a visit by Egypt’s first democratically elected president. But the presence of some charismatic personalities — including Turkey’s Recep Tayyip Erdogan and Iran’s Mahmoud Ahmadinejad — aroused hopes that the delegates would follow up on their pledges. Together they represent a billion people, who want results and not empty rhetoric.

For Pakistan, it would appear as if holding the conference itself was an achievement. The moot was held against a background in which Pakistan suffered some recent foreign policy setbacks: Russian President Vladimir Putin cancelled his visit, while the Indian government refuses to change its stance on Prime Minister Manmohan Singh’s promised visit to Pakistan. While the Russian and Indian decisions were related to geopolitical issues, let us note that foreign sports teams, too, are reluctant to visit the country for security reasons. In fact, most D-8 participants, at one point or another, have had to contend with religious and other forms of militancy, while some continue to face this challenge. This shared, though unfortunate, experience should bind these countries in an endeavour to act more decisively against violence and to take steps to tackle the militant mindset.

Opinion

Editorial

Doctor attacked
09 Jun, 2026

Doctor attacked

AN act of reprehensible violence has shaken the medical community. On Saturday, an employee of the Provincial Civil...
AJK flare-up
Updated 09 Jun, 2026

AJK flare-up

The situation started deteriorating after a trader affiliated with the JAAC was reportedly shot in an altercation with law-enforcers.
Fault lines
09 Jun, 2026

Fault lines

THE April 8 ceasefire that halted hostilities between Israel and Iran has encountered its most serious test yet....
Soft on traders
08 Jun, 2026

Soft on traders

THE Fixed Tax Asaan Scheme for traders with an annual turnover of up to Rs200m has been designed as a ‘pragmatic...
Ceasefire in name
Updated 08 Jun, 2026

Ceasefire in name

Both sides accuse the other of violating the truce that was supposed to halt the conflict in April, yet neither appears willing to abandon negotiations altogether.
Damaged childhoods
08 Jun, 2026

Damaged childhoods

CHILD abuse is so prevalent that the UN ranked Pakistan as the least safe country for children. Even so, more than...