D-8 summit
AS the D-8 summit was held in Islamabad yesterday, people were wondering what the many supranational groupings of which Pakistan is a member have achieved over the decades. The most glaring example is that of the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation which was formed in Dhaka in 1985. Saarc has done little that can be considered a step towards greater economic and cultural cooperation among the member states. Unfortunately, despite yesterday’s adoption of the D-8 charter and pledges to work for closer economic ties and peace, democracy and tolerance, this grouping too, has little to show. Established 15 years ago, D-8 has done nothing except hold periodic conferences, even though the member-states are rich in human and natural resources. The eighth summit brought together five government heads, while Bangladesh, Egypt and Malaysia chose to send their representatives. Sheikh Hasina Wajed’s absence, apparently because of differences with Islamabad, was understandable — though regrettable. Mohamed Morsi’s decision not to attend was also disappointing. Many people were looking forward to a visit by Egypt’s first democratically elected president. But the presence of some charismatic personalities — including Turkey’s Recep Tayyip Erdogan and Iran’s Mahmoud Ahmadinejad — aroused hopes that the delegates would follow up on their pledges. Together they represent a billion people, who want results and not empty rhetoric.
For Pakistan, it would appear as if holding the conference itself was an achievement. The moot was held against a background in which Pakistan suffered some recent foreign policy setbacks: Russian President Vladimir Putin cancelled his visit, while the Indian government refuses to change its stance on Prime Minister Manmohan Singh’s promised visit to Pakistan. While the Russian and Indian decisions were related to geopolitical issues, let us note that foreign sports teams, too, are reluctant to visit the country for security reasons. In fact, most D-8 participants, at one point or another, have had to contend with religious and other forms of militancy, while some continue to face this challenge. This shared, though unfortunate, experience should bind these countries in an endeavour to act more decisively against violence and to take steps to tackle the militant mindset.









D-8 summit is another eye wash – a waste of time and money – nothing constructive going to come-up like the other summits held by these countries.
D8= deteriorating 8 nations.
D8 achievements= 0
How can blind lead another blind
It was good to hold the D-8 Meeting in Pakistan even though it turned out, as usual, just a talking shop apart from the Iranian President’s engagement on the Iran-Pakistan gas pipe-line.
Trade organization limited to Muslims — that alone should tell you why it’s never going to accomplish anything of substance. Trade is trade and religion shouldn’t enter into the equation.
I noticed this article stating that Indian PM is not visiting due to GeoPolitical reasons. Pakistan being unwilling or unable to stop killers trained on its territory is the real reason. One can not deny forever when Jihadi groups of Pakistan themselves (LeT stated they will seek revenge against India mere two days ago) take credit for killing citizens of India of all faiths in the streets of Bombay. The last time the Indian PM visited Pakistan/Lahore there were militants from Pakistan already crossing over into India via Kargil. India is expected to take all this and more, and keep on visiting Pakistan? For what?