Comments on: ‘Changes to Army Act’

By: Mani

Mani — Thu, 29 Nov 2012 15:30:26 +0000

If there was accountability in the army, men like Gen Niazi, Aslam Baig, Durrani, Musharaf, Zia, Ijaz Shah, Akhtar Abdur Rehman, Saeed uz Zaman, would have been punished and dishonorably retired from service without benefits, instead of being allotted lands and given immunity. Everybody who gets paid by the state and tax payer must be made accountable before law of land and judiciary.

By: Aj

Aj — Wed, 28 Nov 2012 18:29:14 +0000

could not have been more clearer. Well written

By: Syed

Syed — Wed, 28 Nov 2012 18:00:40 +0000

Very finely described implications of Army Act and functioning of Army system accordingly. The politicians have already destroyed the Civil Service System and now they are hovering around Army and want to make a dent anywhere in its functioning at any cost. What a tragedy! They are destructive by nature and cannot tolerate smooth functioning institution since ages.

By: Syed Ahmed

Syed Ahmed — Wed, 28 Nov 2012 16:30:08 +0000

There is no need to amend the Pakistan Army Act. As it is flawless and workable. What have we achieved by amending the constitution several times – chaos and confusion?

By: r.s.soni

r.s.soni — Wed, 28 Nov 2012 14:18:30 +0000

sir, no need to tinker with army act.no innocent person is charged with offense like in civil some times.
it is a fair and impartial system. rightly said it has stood the test of time