<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The gas conundrum</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dawn.com/2012/12/06/the-gas-conundrum/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dawn.com/2012/12/06/the-gas-conundrum/</link>
	<description>Latest News, Breaking News, Pakistan News, World News, Business News, Science and Technology News , Entertainment News, Sports News, Cricket News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 12:26:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: farmerdr</title>
		<link>http://dawn.com/2012/12/06/the-gas-conundrum/comment-page-1/#comment-493439</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[farmerdr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 17:28:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dawn.com/?p=3072202#comment-493439</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Excellent article! Observer has a valid point too, the composition of a standing committee with members who represent vested interests rather than the nation reflects very poorly on the selector of the committee yet it does not mean that bona fide parliamentary committees should not question &quot;policy&quot;. The committee however should have no direct influence over a Minister.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent article! Observer has a valid point too, the composition of a standing committee with members who represent vested interests rather than the nation reflects very poorly on the selector of the committee yet it does not mean that bona fide parliamentary committees should not question &#8220;policy&#8221;. The committee however should have no direct influence over a Minister.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: observer</title>
		<link>http://dawn.com/2012/12/06/the-gas-conundrum/comment-page-1/#comment-492389</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[observer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 08:03:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dawn.com/?p=3072202#comment-492389</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I disagree with the last sentence of the article. It is important to reconstitute the Standing Committee by picking members who have no clash of interest rather than telling a Parliamentary Committee to not look at policy matters.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree with the last sentence of the article. It is important to reconstitute the Standing Committee by picking members who have no clash of interest rather than telling a Parliamentary Committee to not look at policy matters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
