Comments on: Can anchors’ ‘anarchy’ end?

By: M.Saleem

M.Saleem — Sat, 15 Dec 2012 17:59:35 +0000

I fully agree with Muzharu Din comments. Some thing is behind such Anchors.Only for their Rating they put the politicians head on collision.

By: muzammil ullah khan

muzammil ullah khan — Sat, 15 Dec 2012 12:50:17 +0000

Anchors are now playing dirty . I dont want to name names but they all have an agenda and I believe they are paid heavily to play a certain role . It is a pity that we have politicians who behave like rowdy nitwits who fight on live TV in a most disgraceful manner . There has to be some regulation but more than that the politicians who appear on their shows should show maturity and should not be taken in by these sly anchors .

By: mazharuddin

mazharuddin — Sat, 15 Dec 2012 11:35:26 +0000

The writer has shown a true picture, electronic media needs to overhaul its system, there seems no honesty in debates on electronic media, further there should have some restrictions, the discussions should be point addressing, no participant should chop logic with avoiding point addressing reply. Against such participants there should have bindings and legal action, media should open door to spectators have immediate condemnation of such participants. As there is large scale corruption, seems impossible, no action notice till yet on comments.

By: baakhlaq

baakhlaq — Sat, 15 Dec 2012 11:15:07 +0000

I can’t resist paying you compliments for hitting the nail upon the head.Majority of the anchorpersons and columnists of the urdu press thrust their opinion upon the audience and take pride in their biases,speak too much and even don’t allow the guests to answer the questions put to them.Code of conduct can be of little help until & unless they go through regular courses and workshops.This will be a wrong assumption that they don’t need courses & workshops because they have been conducting programmes for the last many years.