The Pashtun question

Published December 16, 2012

The mainstream Pashtun nationalist parties endorse the longstanding demand of Baloch nationalists for economic, political and social rights within the parameters of the state. They appear to be on the same page with the Baloch nationalists when it comes to the denial of rights to small nationalities in the country. The Pashtun nationalists perceive that Punjab-dominated establishment has failed to address the grievances of the Balochs, Pashtuns, Sindhis and Saraikis.

“Islamabad’s authoritarian approach towards the small nationalities is the main reason behind the prevailing unrest in Balochistan,” says Rauf Lala, Central Secretary of Pakhtunkhawa Milli Awami Party (PKMAP). The party, which represents the majority of ethnic Pashtuns in Balochistan, is critical of the Baloch ruling class and demand a separate province. Pashtun nationalists were part of the defunct National Awami Party, which formed governments in Balochistan and NWFP (now Khyber Pakhtunkhawa) in 1970s.

When One Unit was abolished, the Pashtun dominated urban British Balochistan was merged into Balochistan province. Khan Shaheed Abdul Samad Khan Achakzai, founder of PKMAP, was the only Pashtun nationalist leader who opposed this move, and demanded Baloch-Pashtun parity in the newly established province.

“We do support Balochistan comprising Baloch areas, not Pashtun areas,” Lala clarifies. He, however, says that there is an increasing polarisation among Balochs regarding Balochistan issue. “All Baloch exile leaders have repeatedly stated that it is a Baloch movement,” he says, adding that there is no space for other nationalities to become part of the ongoing movement.

The Pashtun nationalist leader expresses the hope that peace can return to this part of the country if constitutional, political, economic and social rights are given to the Baloch people.

The Awami National Party (ANP), another Pashtun nationalist party, terms the unconstitutional moves on the part of successive governments as the main reason behind the conflict. Aurangzeb Kasi, provincial president of ANP, argues that the dismissal of Sardar Ataullah Mengal-led government in 1973 was the turning point that created gulf and distrust between Baloch nationalist leaders and Islamabad that widened with the passage of time.

“The killing of Nawab Akbar Khan Bugti, a strong supporter of federation, worsened the situation,” says Kasi. He wanted Baloch people’s control over the coast and resources of Balochistan. Pashtun nationalists still think that the provision of maximum provincial autonomy could resolve the issue.

“The Federation should hand over all subjects to the provinces except defence, trade and currency,” suggests Kasi.—Saleem Shahid

Opinion

Editorial

Sustainable path?
Updated 13 Jun, 2026

Sustainable path?

The FY27 budget is the first clear signal that the government is ready to transition from stabilisation to growth.
Prioritising education
13 Jun, 2026

Prioritising education

THOUGH the improvement in the country’s literacy rate may be slight, as highlighted by the Economic Survey, it ...
Poverty’s rise
13 Jun, 2026

Poverty’s rise

AS attention turns to the government’s plans for the coming fiscal year, one set of figures deserves particular...
A difficult story
Updated 12 Jun, 2026

A difficult story

Unless productivity becomes the dominant target of economic policy, Pakistan will continue to oscillate between crises and fragile recovery.
Rough waters
12 Jun, 2026

Rough waters

AMONGST the key potential triggers for fresh conflict in South Asia is water. The Indian state is behaving in an...
Politicised football
12 Jun, 2026

Politicised football

ALMOST three-and-half years since Lionel Messi led Argentina to FIFA World Cup glory, the latest edition of...