Nato supply truckers go on strike

Published
0

Transporters, who deliver supplies to NATO forces in Afghanistan, listen to the speeches during a rally organized by All Pakistan Goods Transport Ittehad in Karachi January 9, 2013. The placard reads: “abolish the cruel system of Custom and FBR." —Reuters Photo

KARACHI: Pakistani transporters who carry Nato supplies to land-locked Afghanistan have gone on strike, disrupting the flow of goods to Western forces in a protest against a new customs regime aimed at cutting theft.

A spokesman for Afghanistan’s Nato-led force declined to comment on how the strike might affect supplies. When Pakistan previously blocked supplies it cost $100 million extra a month to send supplies on longer, alternate routes, US officials said at the time.

The All Pakistan Goods Transportation Association has been unofficially blockading 4,000 vehicles carrying supplies to and from coalition forces in Afghanistan for the past six days.

The truckers are protesting against a new government-imposed system that will require them to go through authorised companies to carry Nato supplies instead of making individual deals. The system is designed to cut down on theft.

Transporters say that will hurt their business and they have announced that operations would remain suspended until the system is scrapped.

“We will continue striking as long as our demands aren’t met,” transporter Abdul Ghafaaz Niazi said on Wednesday.

“Custom collectorate officials are corrupt. We won’t listen to them. If they want to lose billions of rupees every day, they can.”

Syed Shams Ahmed Burney, chairman of the All Pakistan Custom Bonded Carriers Association, said the transporters’ demands were impractical.

“This system exists to minimise and end pilferage and theft but the transporters want a free-for-all. That is not possible,” he said.

Many supplies for US and other forces in Afghanistan are shipped into the Pakistani port of Karachi and trucked along two routes into Afghanistan.

Pakistan previously banned trucks from carrying Nato-force supplies into Afghanistan in 2011 in protest against a cross-border Nato air strike that inadvertently killed 24 Pakistani soldiers.

The seven-month ban forced the United States to rely on longer, more expensive northern routes through Russia and Central Asia.

The blockade was lifted after US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton apologised for the losses suffered by the Pakistani military in the Nato attack.

Follow Dawn Business on X, LinkedIn, Instagram and Facebook for insights on business, finance and tech from Pakistan and across the world.

Opinion

Editorial

An opening
Updated 03 Nov, 2026

An opening

If this brief opportunity for peace is wasted, sparking a wider conflict, the blame will rest squarely with the US president and the bloodthirsty Zionist regime.
Pakistan’s G-24 role
03 Nov, 2026

Pakistan’s G-24 role

PAKISTAN’S new role as chair of G-24 comes at a crucial moment for the Global South. Developing nations are...
Learning from polio
03 Nov, 2026

Learning from polio

THE eighth polio case of 2026, involving a 13-month-old girl from Khyber’s Bara tehsil, raises an important...
Without consequence
Updated 02 Nov, 2026

Without consequence

From drone attacks to online harassment and legal intimidation, the methods of silencing reporters are multiplying, with little fear of punishment.
Climate diagnosis
02 Nov, 2026

Climate diagnosis

THE Lancet Countdown’s latest findings should change how Pakistan thinks about illness as much as how it thinks...
Fighting harassment
02 Nov, 2026

Fighting harassment

WORKPLACE harassment is often narrowly defined as sexual misconduct. A resolution passed by the National Assembly on...