QUETTA, May 29: A dispute is reported to have emerged between Balochistan’s Caretaker Chief Minister Nawab Ghous Bakhsh Barozai and Chief Secretary Babar Yaqoob Fateh Muhammad over a summary for convening the inaugural session of the provincial assembly.

According to sources, the chief minister had objected to the chief secretary sending the summary to Governor Mir Zulfiqar Ali Magsi before forwarding it to him. When the chief minister later received the summary he refused to sign it and threatened to resign. But sources said the chief secretary had sent the summary to the governor because the chief minister was then in Lahore.

The summary was prepared by the provincial law department.When contacted, the chief secretary denied that he had engaged in an argument with the chief minister during a discussion on the summary as reported by some private TV channels. He said he had neither meet Mr Barozai nor talked to him on phone over the past week.

A spokesman of the Balochistan government rejected the reports as false.

Opinion

Editorial

Under siege
Updated 03 May, 2024

Under siege

Whether through direct censorship, withholding advertising, harassment or violence, the press in Pakistan navigates a hazardous terrain.
Meddlesome ways
03 May, 2024

Meddlesome ways

AFTER this week’s proceedings in the so-called ‘meddling case’, it appears that the majority of judges...
Mass transit mess
03 May, 2024

Mass transit mess

THAT Karachi — one of the world’s largest megacities — does not have a mass transit system worth the name is ...
Punishing evaders
02 May, 2024

Punishing evaders

THE FBR’s decision to block mobile phone connections of more than half a million individuals who did not file...
Engaging Riyadh
Updated 02 May, 2024

Engaging Riyadh

It must be stressed that to pull in maximum foreign investment, a climate of domestic political stability is crucial.
Freedom to question
02 May, 2024

Freedom to question

WITH frequently suspended freedoms, increasing violence and few to speak out for the oppressed, it is unlikely that...