The anniversary edition — the cover of which features a young woman fixing her makeup in a powder compact — has been criticised for misrepresenting the work and trivialising its content.

The London Review of Books was among the first to question the cover. “You don’t need to have read the novel to see what the problem is; the blurb on the back of the offending cover makes it clear enough: the narrator, we are told, ‘grapples with difficult relationships and a society which refuses to take women’s aspirations seriously’,” wrote blogger Fatema Ahmed.

She suggested that Plath’s work had become a victim of commercial pressures. “…[I]t may be true that paperbacks with photographs of people on them shift more copies in supermarkets. But it isn’t as if The Bell Jar has to earn out its advance. And for some reason the rule doesn’t apply to recent anniversary redesigns of Orwell (by David Pearson for Penguin) or BS Johnson (by La Boca for Picador). Lucky them.”

Andy Pressman, a graphic designer, called the cover “Awesomelycomicallyhistorically inapprop”. He added: “And by ‘historically’ I mean incorrect on a scale of which we have few historical precedents,” not “that typeface didn’t exist in that era.”

The feminist blog Jezebel called the cover “hideous”, adding: “If Sylvia Plath hadn’t already killed herself, she probably would’ve if she saw the new cover of her only novel The Bell Jar. For a book all about a woman’s clinical depression that’s exacerbated by the suffocating gender stereotypes to which she’s expected to adhere and the limited life choices she has as a woman, it’s pretty … stupid to feature a low-rent retro wannabe pinup applying makeup. (Also, it’s ugly and the colours suck).”

Writer Tracie Egan Morrissey noted that “redesigning feminist staples and classic literary ladies to be more appealing to the larger and more lucrative chick lit audience is apparently a common practice”.

A searing examination of the ravages of mental illness and the limitations of 1950s American society, The Bell Jar tells the story of college student Esther Greenwood, and the enclosing bell jar of her depression. The first edition of the novel to appear under Plath’s name featured a cover designed by Shirley Tucker, with a bold type face and urgent concentric circles.

Fans of the novel were outraged that a similarly bold cover has not been used to mark the 50th anniversary of its publication. Reader Sarah McAlpine wrote: “It’s a lady book? About a lady? Let’s make it pink and grab a stock photo of a lady with make up. Ladies love that.” — The Guardian, London

Proposition 34 — which would have seen capital punishment scrapped — was rejected by 53 per cent of voters on Tuesday. Both pro- and anti-capital punishment campaigners now expect that Californians will be asked again either to abolish the death penalty or to reform the state’s legal structure in order to get executions carried out more quickly.

The defeat came as a huge blow to capital punishment abolitionists who yearned for the most significant victory for a generation. Campaigners across the US hoped a yes vote for Proposition 34 on Nov 6 would provide a boost to their efforts and send a warning note to the other 32 states that still hand out the punishment.

California has the highest number of prisoners awaiting execution of any US state, with 724 death row inmates. The next largest total is in Texas, where there are 407. A moratorium on executions has been in place in California for nearly seven years.

Confusion and delays have been common in the state since a federal judge put executions on hold in early 2006 until prison officials adopt new lethal injection procedures to ensure no inmate suffers “cruel and unusual” pain. It is estimated it will be months, if not years, before the execution of the next death row inmate because of likely legal wrangling.

If obstacles relating to the method of execution are removed, however, at least 14 inmates who have exhausted their legal appeals could face immediate execution. The state has executed 13 inmates overall since 1978.

McGregor Scott, the former US attorney for Sacramento and co-chair of the opposition campaign, called for a reform to executions by streamlining the appeals process and scrapping the state’s three-drug cocktail in favour of a single-drug lethal injection. “The problems with delay and expense of California’s death penalty are entirely fixable,” he said.

Death penalty abolitionists argued that the closeness of the vote meant that voters were moving towards abolition. Campaign manager Natasha Minsker said there had been a “dramatic shift” in California voters’ view of the death penalty and the fight to have the penalty repealed would continue.

San Mateo county district attorney Steve Wagstaffe is next week expected to ask a judge to bypass state and federal court orders halting executions to allow the state to immediately put condemned killer Robert Fairbank to death with a single lethal drug, according to the Santa Cruz Sentinel.

“A lot of things slowed down with this initiative on the horizon,” Douglas Berman, an Ohio State University law professor told the paper. “The pregnant question going forward in California is, Ok, with (Proposition 34) cleared out, do we get a serious progression towards executions and, then, what’s the public response to that going to be?” — The Guardian, London