CIA admits role in 1953 Iran coup: report

Published
27

Today, on the 60th anniversary of the coup against Iran’s Mohammed Mossadegh, Foreign Policy Magazine (FPM) reported that the National Security Archive website — an independent non-governmental research institute and library located at The George Washington University in Washington DC — has published a document in which the CIA openly acknowledges its involvement in the overthrow of the man who was elected as Iran’s prime minister.

Mossadegh, who was the prime minister of Iran, was overthrown on August 19, 1953 in what was for years believed to be a plot backed by the US and the UK. The event changed the course of history in Iran, the effects of which continue to echo to this day.

According to the report in FPM, the National Security Archive obtained the document through the Freedom of Information Act request. The document is a brief excerpt from a report titled “The Battle for Iran,” an internal report prepared in the mid-1970s by an in-house CIA historian.

While the document was first released in 1981, most of it had been redacted, including Section III titled "Covert Action,” which describes the events relating to the coup.

Even though most of the document remains redacted even now, the new version formally and implicitly admits the involvement of the CIA in the overthrow for the first time: "[T]he military coup that overthrew Mossadegh and his National Front cabinet was carried out under CIA direction as an act of US foreign policy," the history reads.

The risk of leaving Iran "open to Soviet aggression…compelled the United States...in planning and executing TPAJAX," it said.

FPM reported that TPAJAX was the CIA's codename for the overthrow plot, which heavily employed the used of local collaborators in its execution.

The document, "The Battle for Iran," available here and here provides two separate releases of the same document, declassified 30 years apart in 1981 and 2011 respectively.

According to the National Security Archive, each version contains portions that have been redacted in the other. While the document itself is undated, hand written edits and footnotes imply that the document was written in or after 1974.

The author is said to have been a member of the CIA's History Staff who acknowledges "the enthusiastic cooperation" of the agency's Directorate of Operations, but also concedes that most of the relevant files were destroyed in 1962. The account, therefore, relies on the relatively few remaining records as well as on sources available to the public.

Opinion

Editorial

Muddled hierarchy
15 Nov, 2026

Muddled hierarchy

THE Federal Constitutional Court marked its first anniversary on Friday with a commemorative stamp. Speaking on the...
Growing crisis
15 Nov, 2026

Growing crisis

AN emergency can be judged by the speed with which it draws an effective response. The National Population Council’s...
Organised rackets
15 Nov, 2026

Organised rackets

ON the International Day against Transnational Organised Crime, observed today, Pakistan finds itself in a tight...
Referendum talk
Updated 14 Nov, 2026

Referendum talk

Unless the PPP is deliberately using Sindh as a bargaining chip, it should issue a clarification with a clear, consistent position on new administrative units, not one tailored to protect its home turf.
Mineral wealth
Updated 14 Nov, 2026

Mineral wealth

Minerals should not be presented as a solution to Pakistan’s long-term economic difficulties. The aim should be to build an industrial base rather than export raw materials.
Late diagnosis
14 Nov, 2026

Late diagnosis

AS we mark World Diabetes Day today, Pakistan faces a troubling question: how many people are living with diabetes...