UK privacy laws hold no authority over us: Google

Published August 19, 2013
US firm Google claims that local laws do not hold "jurisdiction" over its actions. — AFP Photo
US firm Google claims that local laws do not hold "jurisdiction" over its actions. — AFP Photo

August 9, 2013 - In a statement signifying disregard for the concept of national sovereignty, Google has informed British consumers taking legal action against it that UK laws do not apply to them and that they do not have to respond to any requests from English courts to appear in front of them.

The campaign group, Safari Users Against Google’s Secret Tracking, claim that Google circumvented privacy settings in the integrated ‘Safari’ web browser that comes pre-installed on all models of iPhones and iPads made by Apple and continued to track users’ online activity even after ‘cookies’ were turned off and all security levels were at their highest possible level.

By default, Apple prevents websites such as Google to install small files like cookies to track online behavior, but software engineers at Google found a way around Apple’s filters.

This security breach was first exposed by a student and researcher at Stanford University who published his findings in the United States. On the basis of these findings, the US Federal Trade Commission found Google guilty of violating relevant laws and fined the company a record $22.5 million while saying “all companies must... keep their privacy promises to consumers, or they will end up paying many times what it would have cost to comply in the first place”.

Google claims that as its consumer services are provided by Google Inc, based in Silicon Valley, California, rather than Google UK, it is an American company and there is “no jurisdiction” for the case to be heard in Britain and that any lawsuits against it should be filed within the United States.

This move sets off an alarming precedent and raises questions about the millions of users who use popular consumer websites run by Microsoft and Facebook, who provide their services through local subsidiaries and therefore could potentially make the same argument were they to run afoul of the law.

One of the claimants, Marc Bradshaw, believes that Google is simply trying to avoid responsibility for its actions.

“It seems to us absurd that consumers can’t bring a claim against a company which is operating in the UK and is even constructing a $1 billion headquarters in London,” he stated.

Opinion

Editorial

Judiciary’s SOS
Updated 28 Mar, 2024

Judiciary’s SOS

The ball is now in CJP Isa’s court, and he will feel pressure to take action.
Data protection
28 Mar, 2024

Data protection

WHAT do we want? Data protection laws. When do we want them? Immediately. Without delay, if we are to prevent ...
Selling humans
28 Mar, 2024

Selling humans

HUMAN traders feed off economic distress; they peddle promises of a better life to the impoverished who, mired in...
New terror wave
Updated 27 Mar, 2024

New terror wave

The time has come for decisive government action against militancy.
Development costs
27 Mar, 2024

Development costs

A HEFTY escalation of 30pc in the cost of ongoing federal development schemes is one of the many decisions where the...
Aitchison controversy
Updated 27 Mar, 2024

Aitchison controversy

It is hoped that higher authorities realise that politics and nepotism have no place in schools.