India court clears controversial BCCI chief to contest vote

Published September 27, 2013
Narainswamy Srinivasan. -Photo by AFP
Narainswamy Srinivasan. -Photo by AFP

NEW DELHI: India's Supreme Court on Friday cleared the country's cricket chief N. Srinivasan to seek a third term in his role at an election this weekend, but barred him from taking charge immediately after the vote.

A cricket association in eastern Bihar state had petitioned the court to stop Srinivasan from contesting the vote for president of the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) because his son-in-law was charged in a corruption scandal.

Srinivasan's son-in-law Gurunath Meiyappan is among several officials, players and bookmakers charged with cheating and criminal conspiracy in a spot-fixing scandal that has rocked the Indian Premier League, a Twenty20 tournament run by the BCCI.

“Why he is in charge if his son-in-law has been charge-sheeted,” the Press Trust of India quoted the judge as asking Srinivasan's lawyers.

“Why are you so keen to be elected? The elections can take place, but he cannot assume charge until the matter is decided.”

Srinivasan had temporarily stepped aside as president in June when he handed interim charge to Jagmohan Dalmiya, a former head of the International Cricket Council.

However, he has continued to pull the strings behind the scene and ensured on Wednesday that his bete noire, IPL founder Lalit Modi, was banned for life from the sport.

The 68-year-old, who has headed the BCCI since 2011, is widely expected to be elected unopposed for another year when the elections take place in his home city of Chennai on Sunday.

Srinivasan has distanced himself from his son-in-law, saying he himself has not been blamed or charged in the scandal.

Meiyappan was the team principal of the Chennai Super Kings franchise, which is owned by the India Cements conglomerate run by Srinivasan.

The Bihar association, which is not part of the BCCI, had opposed Srinivasan's return since another court had termed as “illegal” an internal probe panel that absolved Srinivasan, Meiyappan, India Cements and other IPL officials of wrongdoing.

The petitioner, Aditya Verma, said the court's interim order should convince BCCI members to keep Srinivasan out.

“Would they want to elect someone who has no powers to discharge any function?” Verma asked reporters.

“I am very happy with the Supreme Court ruling.”

The BCCI chief is widely regarded as the most powerful man in world cricket due to India's vast television audience which enables the board to generate almost 70 percent of the game's revenues and allows India to have its way in major decisions.

Opinion

Editorial

China security ties
Updated 14 Nov, 2024

China security ties

If China's security concerns aren't addressed satisfactorily, it may affect bilateral ties. CT cooperation should be pursued instead of having foreign forces here.
Steep price
14 Nov, 2024

Steep price

THE Hindu Kush-Himalayan region is in big trouble. A new study unveiled at the ongoing COP29 reveals that if high...
A high-cost plan
14 Nov, 2024

A high-cost plan

THE government has approved an expensive plan for FBR in the hope of tackling its deep-seated inefficiencies. The...
United stance
Updated 13 Nov, 2024

United stance

It would've been better if the OIC-Arab League summit had announced practical measures to punish Israel.
Unscheduled visit
13 Nov, 2024

Unscheduled visit

Unusual IMF visit shows the lender will closely watch implementation of programme goals to prevent it from derailing.
Bara’s businesswomen
13 Nov, 2024

Bara’s businesswomen

Bara’s brave women have proven that with the right support, societal barriers can be overcome.