HIS death may have been brutal and swift, but his reign of brutality was long — and will surely be enduring in some form after his death. When a Pakistani militant supremo is killed by an American drone at the very time the country’s political leadership is trying to negotiate with the Taliban, the inevitable controversy and uproar can thoroughly obfuscate and confuse matters. So let us try and separate the issues. First, Hakeemullah Mehsud was a brutal, smart and dangerous enemy of Pakistan. When his predecessor Baitullah Mehsud was killed in a drone strike in 2009, Hakeemullah Mehsud had already established himself as the standout in the next tier of the TTP’s leadership. And in his four-plus years at the head of the umbrella militancy group that is the TTP, Mehsud more than proved he was a formidable opponent in the battlefield, a shrewd terrorist and a political mastermind who could manipulate public and political opinion.

Next, a violent militant mastermind he may have been, but what to make of an American drone killing him at this particular point in time? Was it an entirely unilateral strike, with no tacit approval from the Pakistani state — army or civilian — and absolutely no coordination with the military in Fata? If that is the case, Mehsud’s death may in fact create more complications than it can help resolve. For while TTP watchers believe there is no one else in the present TTP leadership who can easily fill Mehsud’s sandals, American fingerprints all over a massively high-profile killing in a country that is already hostile to US interference can lead to all manner of unpredictable consequences at this time. The argument that after the capture of his No. 2 in Afghanistan recently, the Americans only now were able to track down Mehsud is weak. After all, Mehsud was killed in what was known to be his own recently constructed home, a place that almost surely had to have been under at least aerial surveillance. So why now? And to what end? Drones often leave more questions in their wake than answers.

Of course, the overheated response of Imran Khan and Interior Minister Chaudhry Nisar Ali Khan yesterday must be parsed too. If peace talks were not derailed by repeated militant attacks in recent months, why must an attack on the TTP leadership necessarily scuttle the possibility of talks? Or are the politicians looking for a scapegoat and have pounced on the ultimate outside conspirator they could possibly hope for?

Opinion

Editorial

Judiciary’s SOS
Updated 28 Mar, 2024

Judiciary’s SOS

The ball is now in CJP Isa’s court, and he will feel pressure to take action.
Data protection
28 Mar, 2024

Data protection

WHAT do we want? Data protection laws. When do we want them? Immediately. Without delay, if we are to prevent ...
Selling humans
28 Mar, 2024

Selling humans

HUMAN traders feed off economic distress; they peddle promises of a better life to the impoverished who, mired in...
New terror wave
Updated 27 Mar, 2024

New terror wave

The time has come for decisive government action against militancy.
Development costs
27 Mar, 2024

Development costs

A HEFTY escalation of 30pc in the cost of ongoing federal development schemes is one of the many decisions where the...
Aitchison controversy
Updated 27 Mar, 2024

Aitchison controversy

It is hoped that higher authorities realise that politics and nepotism have no place in schools.