ISLAMABAD, Nov 20: The Supreme Court formally commenced on Wednesday contempt proceedings against Defence Secretary retired Lt Gen Asif Yasin Malik for not honouring his undertaking of holding the much-needed local government elections in all 43 cantonment boards by Sept 15.

A three-judge bench headed by Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry started the proceedings after a five-judge larger bench had on Nov 18 dismissed his intra-court appeal challenging the indictment and trial on contempt charges.

The court had on Nov 5 indicted the secretary for committing its contempt.

On Wednesday, the court allowed Attorney General Muneer A. Malik to withdraw himself from prosecuting the defence secretary because he remained associated with the case when the secretary had given the undertaking.

In his place, Additional Attorney General Shahkhawar appeared and submitted three orders issued by the Supreme Court as evidence to prosecute the secretary.

However, Iftikhar Gillani, who was representing the defence secretary, sought time and said he had yet to get instructions from his client who was in America to attend a scheduled Pakistan-US dialogue.

He said Gen Malik was leading the Pakistani delegation and his presence there was necessary. “The dialogue is likely to conclude on Nov 23 after which he will return to the country,” Mr Gillani said.

The court said it would commence the proceedings with the recording of evidence first and regretted that a senior government official had failed to fulfil his commitment made before the Supreme Court.

The proceedings were adjourned to Dec 2.

Opinion

Editorial

A breakthrough?
07 May, 2026

A breakthrough?

The whole world would welcome an end to this pointless war.
Missed opportunity
07 May, 2026

Missed opportunity

A BIG opportunity to industrialise Pakistan has just passed us by. This has been reconfirmed by the investment...
Punishing dissent
07 May, 2026

Punishing dissent

THE Sindh government’s treatment of the Aurat March this week was a disgraceful assault on democratic rights. What...
The May war
Updated 06 May, 2026

The May war

Rationality demands that both states come to the table and discuss their grievances, and their solutions in a mature manner.
Looking inwards
06 May, 2026

Looking inwards

REGULAR appraisals by human rights groups and activists should not be treated by the authorities as attempts to ...
Feeling the heat
06 May, 2026

Feeling the heat

ANOTHER heatwave season has begun, and once again, the state is scrambling to respond to conditions it has long been...