Property tycoon allowed to use Bahria as brand for 10 days

Published April 5, 2015
The Bahria Foundation had pleaded to restrain Malik Riaz from using the word Bahria for his housing scheme and sought damages from the property tycoon.   — Reuters/file
The Bahria Foundation had pleaded to restrain Malik Riaz from using the word Bahria for his housing scheme and sought damages from the property tycoon. — Reuters/file

ISLAMABAD: An additional district and sessions judge (ADSJ) in Rawalpindi on Saturday allowed property tycoon Malik Riaz Hussain to use Bahria as the brand name for his housing project till April 14, the next date of hearing.

Mohammad Ashraf, the ADSJ, issued the order while hearing an appeal filed by Malik Riaz against the verdict given by Civil Judge Nadiatuz Zuhra Naqvi on March 27, in which she stopped Malik Riaz from using Bahria as the brand name for his housing project.

Read: Malik Riaz loses right to ‘Bahria’ brand name

Judge Naqvi had given the single order while hearing three identical petitions - two filed by Bahria Foundation and the third by Hussain Global, a property firm linked to Malik Riaz.

The three petitions were filed over the Bahria name issue that had been lingering on since 2002. Civil Judge Zuhra Naqvi had also set aside the stay order obtained by Malik Riaz in 2002.

“On the next date of hearing, the Bahria Foundation, a subsidiary of Pakistan Navy, would file its response to the petition filed by Malik Riaz,” a lawyer associated with the case told Dawn.

The Bahria Foundation had pleaded to restrain Malik Riaz from using the word Bahria for his housing scheme and sought damages from the property tycoon.

The third petition filed by Malik Riaz alleged that the naval officials forced him to sign an agreement according to which he was bound to give up the Bahria brand name.

Since 1996, Malik Riaz with the consent of Bahria Foundation was using the naval nomenclature for his housing project.

In 2000, the foundation stopped him from using ‘Bahria’ for his housing society and also signed an agreement with the property tycoon in this regard on February 24 of the same year.

However, in 2002, Malik Riaz filed an application with the local court alleging that he was forced to sign the agreement.

Published in Dawn, April 5th, 2015

On a mobile phone? Get the Dawn Mobile App: Apple Store | Google Play

Opinion

Editorial

China security ties
Updated 14 Nov, 2024

China security ties

If China's security concerns aren't addressed satisfactorily, it may affect bilateral ties. CT cooperation should be pursued instead of having foreign forces here.
Steep price
14 Nov, 2024

Steep price

THE Hindu Kush-Himalayan region is in big trouble. A new study unveiled at the ongoing COP29 reveals that if high...
A high-cost plan
14 Nov, 2024

A high-cost plan

THE government has approved an expensive plan for FBR in the hope of tackling its deep-seated inefficiencies. The...
United stance
Updated 13 Nov, 2024

United stance

It would've been better if the OIC-Arab League summit had announced practical measures to punish Israel.
Unscheduled visit
13 Nov, 2024

Unscheduled visit

Unusual IMF visit shows the lender will closely watch implementation of programme goals to prevent it from derailing.
Bara’s businesswomen
13 Nov, 2024

Bara’s businesswomen

Bara’s brave women have proven that with the right support, societal barriers can be overcome.