Israel settler law angers world powers, US silent

Published February 8, 2017
Labourers work at a construction site in the Israeli settlement of Maale Adumim in occupied West Bank on Tuesday.— Reuters
Labourers work at a construction site in the Israeli settlement of Maale Adumim in occupied West Bank on Tuesday.— Reuters

JERUSALEM: Israel faced international criticism on Tuesday over a new law allowing the appropriation of private Palestinian land for Jewish settler outposts, although the United States remained notably silent.

Britain, France, the United Nations and Israel’s neighbour Jordan were among those coming out against the legislation passed late on Monday.

The law legalises dozens of wildcat outposts and thousands of settler homes in the occupied West Bank and prompted a call by the Palestinians for the international community to punish Israel.

Pro-Palestinian Israeli NGOs said they would ask the Supreme Court to strike down the law, while Israeli opposition leader Isaac Herzog warned the legislation could result in Israeli officials facing the International Criminal Court.

France called the bill a “new attack on the two-state solution,” while Britain said it “damages Israel’s standing with its international partners”.

Turkey “strongly condemned” the law and Israel’s “unacceptable” settlement policy and the Arab League accused Israel of “stealing the land and appropriating the property of Palestinians.”

UN envoy for the Middle East peace process Nickolay Mladenov said the bill crossed a “thick red line” towards annexation of the West Bank — the largest part of the Palestinian territories. “[The law] opens the potential for the full annexation of the West Bank and therefore undermines substantially the two-state solution,” he said.

The United States, however, refused to comment, in stark contrast to the settlement criticism repeatedly voiced under Barack Obama.

The State Department said President Donald Trump’s new administration “needs to have the chance to fully consult with all parties on the way forward.”

Separately to the new law, Israel has approved more than 6,000 settler homes since Trump took office on Jan 20 having signalled a softer stance on the issue than Obama.

The law, which passed 60 to 52 in its final reading, will allow Israel to legally seize Palestinian private land on which Israelis built outposts without knowing it was private property or because the state allowed them to do so.

Palestinian owners will be compensated financially or with other land. It would apply to around 53 outposts as well as some houses within existing settlements, potentially legalising more than 3,800 homes, according to anti-settlement NGO Peace Now, which called the law “another step towards annexation and away from a two-state solution.”

The law could still be challenged, with Defence Minister Avigdor Lieberman saying last week it was likely to be struck down by the Supreme Court.

International law considers all settlements illegal, but Israel distinguishes between those it sanctions and those it does not, which are known as outposts.

The new law would protect settlers against eviction from outposts discovered to have been built on private Palestinian lands such as in the case of Amona, where 42 families were evicted and their homes demolished in recent days at the order of the Israeli Supreme Court. Palestinian official Hanan Ashrawi called for the international community to assume its “moral, human and legal responsibilities and put an end to Israel’s lawlessness.”

The act marked the first time Israel applied its civil law to land in the West Bank recognised as Palestinian, said law professor Amichai Cohen.

UN envoy Mladenov also raised the possibility of potential court cases in the International Criminal Court against Israeli officials.

Israeli Attorney General Avichai Mandelblit has also warned the government that the law may be unconstitutional and risks exposing Israel to international prosecution for war crimes.

Human Rights Watch said the legislation “reflects Israel’s manifest disregard of international law.”

Bezalel Smotrich of the far-right Jewish Home party, who was one of the forces behind the legislation, thanked the American people for electing Trump as president, “without whom the law would have probably not passed”.

Published in Dawn, February 8th, 2017

Opinion

The fallout

The fallout

Faced with an untrustworthy trade partner in the US, the economic imperative for countries would be to pursue trade diversion.

Editorial

April heat
Updated 14 Apr, 2025

April heat

A much broader and more cohesive plan is needed to meet Pakistan’s changing requirements amidst an accelerating climate crisis.
ADB’s advice
14 Apr, 2025

ADB’s advice

WITH the Trump administration’s trade war on China and the rest of the world having led to global economic...
‘Land of the free’
14 Apr, 2025

‘Land of the free’

IN Trumpian America, even those foreigners with legal status are finding that the walls are closing in on them. As...
Caught in between
Updated 13 Apr, 2025

Caught in between

In the absence of a trade agreement, under WTO rules, Pakistan cannot reduce duty rates for the US without doing the same for other countries.
Spirit of giving
13 Apr, 2025

Spirit of giving

THE recent declaration by ulema affirming that organ donation after death is not only permissible but an act of...
Targeting dissent
13 Apr, 2025

Targeting dissent

THE recent notice sent by the FIA to former senator Farhatullah Babar is deeply troubling — and revealing....