An undated family photo provided by Rebecca Davis of Raymond Davis, 36. Raymond Davis, who shot and killed two Pakistani men, was released from Pakistan prison Wednesday, March 16, 2011 and left Pakistan after more than $2 million was paid to his victims' families, defusing a dispute that threatened an alliance vital to defeating al-Qaida and ending the Afghan war. — AP Photo

ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court was requested on Thursday to declare that the additional district and sessions judge, who freed CIA contractor Raymond Davis, had acted without jurisdiction because the matter did not fall within his domain.

A petition, filed by Advocate Rai Mohammad Nawaz Kharal on behalf of Molvi Iqbal Haider, sought a declaration from the apex court that the offence of killing two Pakistanis in broad daylight on a crowded Lahore street was not triable by a district and sessions court because such offences fell under the jurisdiction of anti-terrorism courts.

“Therefore, the decision of the Lahore sessions court to release Raymond Davis after a compromise agreement is illegal, unconstitutional, void and without any legal sanctity,” the petitioner contended.

After remaining more than one-and-a-half months in detention Davis was released and quickly flown out of Pakistan on Wednesday after heirs of the two youths he had shot dead on Jan 27 accepted blood money under diyat laws.

The petitioner accused the federal government, Punjab prosecutor-general and the station house officer of Lytton police of having failed to fulfil their statutory duties that had led to Davis's release.

“The offences occurred on Jan 27 in Lahore fall under sections 6 and 7 of the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997, but the sessions court deliberately, intentionally and in connivance with the respondents refrained to settle a basic question whether it was competent to entertain the Davis case or to transfer the matter to an anti-terrorism court,” the petitioner said, adding that the sessions court had ordered the release of the American citizen in disregard of sovereignty, integrity and solidarity of the state and dignity of the citizens of Pakistan.

He said that Davis had committed offences which were non-compoundable and in case of waiver or compounding of the offences, the conditions should have been considered by the trial court, but the sessions court judge ignored and avoided considering relevant laws and independence of judiciary.

Opinion

Editorial

E-governance
Updated 10 Jan, 2025

E-governance

Wishing for a viable e-governance system seems like a pipe dream when stable internet connectivity is not guaranteed.
Khuzdar rampage
Updated 10 Jan, 2025

Khuzdar rampage

Authorities must explain how terrorists were able to commandeer the area for eight hours.
Beyond wheelchairs
10 Jan, 2025

Beyond wheelchairs

THE KP government’s Rs370m assistance programme for persons with disabilities is a positive step, not only in ...
Taking cover
Updated 09 Jan, 2025

Taking cover

IT is unfortunate that, instead of taking ownership of important decisions, our officials usually seem keener to ...
A living hell
09 Jan, 2025

A living hell

WHAT Donald Trump does domestically when he enters the White House in just under two weeks is frankly the American...
A right denied
09 Jan, 2025

A right denied

DESPITE citizens possessing the constitutional and legal right to access it, federal ministries are failing to...