ISLAMABAD, Oct 3: Even after the change of government, internet surveillance is expected to remain the same and blockade of some internet services like YouTube may continue in the country. It has been revealed by a study on ‘Freedom on the Net 2013’ conducted by the Digital Rights Foundation (DRF) Pakistan along with research analysts of Freedom House to assess freedom on the net in 60 countries. The DRF has worked for several months to research, compile and assess the limits on contents, violations of user rights and overall internet freedom in Pakistan.

The study report claims that members of civil society have strongly condemned the presence of FinFisher’s Spy tools on the Pakistan Telecommunication Ltd network. The government’s plan to systematise websites blocking has been one of the most worrisome developments in 2012 and this year. It said violations of user rights had been on the rise last year, with cases like the shooting of a 15-year-old blogger and activist Malala Yousufzai. A number of blasphemy cases were also registered, sometimes just to settle business rivalries.

“Pakistan remains one of the worst countries when it comes to online freedom of speech, user rights and citizens’ privacy,” DRF Executive Director Nighat Dad said. “The state has been rigorously trying to implement the best of surveillance setups to create a kind of watchdog upon activists, journalists and a common citizen in the name of war against terrorism. Pakistan’s civil society, despite being faced with threats and vicious consequences, is strongly fighting against the state-employed policies and technologies that can hurt citizens”. According to the report, the upper house of parliament in February granted security agencies permission to monitor private emails and cellphone communications in order to collect evidence of terrorist activities, threatening citizens’ privacy. In areas like Balochistan, activists are even more at threat with plethora of intelligence agencies and the army trying to suppress their voices.

The report found that intelligence agencies had been pressuring the federal government for greater surveillance control and location tracking system. “While all this has been moved forward to fight against terrorists, it is evident that these technologies are used to threaten media personnel and attack activists and other common citizens,” it said.

Opinion

Who bears the cost?

Who bears the cost?

This small window of low inflation should compel a rethink of how the authorities and employers understand the average household’s

Editorial

Internet restrictions
Updated 23 Dec, 2024

Internet restrictions

Notion that Pakistan enjoys unprecedented freedom of expression difficult to reconcile with the reality of restrictions.
Bangladesh reset
23 Dec, 2024

Bangladesh reset

THE vibes were positive during Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif’s recent meeting with Bangladesh interim leader Dr...
Leaving home
23 Dec, 2024

Leaving home

FROM asylum seekers to economic migrants, the continuing exodus from Pakistan shows mass disillusionment with the...
Military convictions
Updated 22 Dec, 2024

Military convictions

Pakistan’s democracy, still finding its feet, cannot afford such compromises on core democratic values.
Need for talks
22 Dec, 2024

Need for talks

FOR a long time now, the country has been in the grip of relentless political uncertainty, featuring the...
Vulnerable vaccinators
22 Dec, 2024

Vulnerable vaccinators

THE campaign to eradicate polio from Pakistan cannot succeed unless the safety of vaccinators and security personnel...