Man who 'endangered' PIA plane 'idiot, not terrorist'

Published November 13, 2013
-File Photo
-File Photo

LONDON: A man accused of sparking a security alert on a Pakistan International Airways plane acted like an “idiot” but did not make a serious bomb threat, a British court heard Wednesday.

Mohammed Safdar, 42, and his friend Tayyab Subhani, 30, were arrested in May after their flight from Lahore to Manchester in northwest England had to make an emergency diversion to London's Stansted Airport.

Britain scrambled Typhoon fighter jets to intercept the flight.

The British-born pair deny endangering the plane.

A previous court hearing was told that the men had become aggressive towards airline stewards and had made false threats that the “crew and passengers would be killed and the aircraft blown up before landing”.

But a passenger on the flight told the men's trial in Chelmsford, southeast England, that although Safdar had acted like an “idiot”, he had not made a serious bomb threat and other travellers had not felt threatened.

“I heard the men say jokingly between themselves 'I bet they think there's a bomb on the plane',” Ferzana Rana told the court.

“He was swearing in Urdu and a lot of the words and language were not something anybody would want to repeat.”

Safdar twice told a steward “I'm going to kill you” in Urdu, she added.

But asked if the steward had taken the remarks seriously, she said: “No, it was just an idiotic remark.”

Once on the ground, many passengers expressed annoyance that the flight had been diverted over a “trivial incident”, Rana told the court.

Subhani had encouraged Safdar but had not behaved in an abusive manner, she added.

The men, from Lancashire in northwest England, claim the allegations are made up and that cabin crew encouraged passengers to corroborate their story.

They had been returning from Safdar's mother's funeral in Pakistan.

Prosecutors have stressed that the pair are not Islamic extremists or “terrorists” but that the crew was forced to take the threats seriously.

“Such utterances, if made at ground level, may sometimes be capable of being ignored,” prosecutor Brian O'Neill told the court as the trial opened on Tuesday.

“But when those threats are made in flight at 30,000 feet on a commercial jet, that's not an option.”

Once on the ground, the plane was surrounded by armed police under a full-scale bomb alert. The trial is expected to last five weeks.

Opinion

Editorial

Kurram ‘roadmap’
Updated 25 Dec, 2024

Kurram ‘roadmap’

The state must provide ironclad guarantees that the local population will be protected from all forms of terrorism.
Snooping state
25 Dec, 2024

Snooping state

THE state’s attempts to pry into citizens’ internet activities continue apace. The latest in this regard is a...
A welcome first step
25 Dec, 2024

A welcome first step

THE commencement of a dialogue between the PTI and the coalition parties occupying the treasury benches in ...
High troop losses
Updated 24 Dec, 2024

High troop losses

Continuing terror attacks show that our counterterrorism measures need a revamp. Localised IBOs appear to be a sound and available option.
Energy conundrum
24 Dec, 2024

Energy conundrum

THE onset of cold weather in the country has brought with it a familiar woe: a severe shortage of piped gas for...
Positive cricket change
24 Dec, 2024

Positive cricket change

HEADING into their Champions Trophy title defence, Pakistan are hitting the right notes. Mohammad Rizwan’s charges...