Missing persons case: IG FC issued contempt of court notice

Published December 5, 2013
The court had previously warned IG FC Maj-Gen Ijaz Shahid to appear before it on Dec 5 or face contempt charges.—File Photo
The court had previously warned IG FC Maj-Gen Ijaz Shahid to appear before it on Dec 5 or face contempt charges.—File Photo

ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court on Thursday served a contempt of court notice to the inspector general of the Frontier Corps (FC) for not complying with its order in a case relating to the 'missing persons' of Balochistan.

This is the first time that a serving general has been issued a contempt of court notice. The court had previously warned IG FC Maj-Gen Ijaz Shahid that he may face contempt charges if he fails to appear before it on Dec 5.

During proceedings today, Attorney General Irfan Qadir appeared in court as counsel for Maj-Gen Shahid. However, the court said that the IG FC would not be given any leverage as long as he refuses to appear in court himself.

Heading the three-judge bench, Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry said that the IG FC should physically appear in court and explain his reasons for not obeying the orders of the court.

The chief justice directed the secretary interior to issue a notice to Maj-Gen Shahid and ensure his presence in court.

In a parrallel case relating to disappearance of one Yasin Shah and similar enforced disappearances, the federal government was yet again unable to present the remaining missing persons. Defence Minister Khwaja Asif pleaded the three-judge bench of the apex court for further time to produce the victims. However, the court rejected the plea.

The Supreme Court had given the government a final deadline of Thursday to produce the 33 missing persons.

The chief justice remarked that the court should summon somebody else if the defence minister was helpless.

Asif told the bench that the whereabouts of five to seven missings persons had been ascertained, but he was unable to reveal that information in public and requested an in-camera hearing.

Responding to the request, the chief justice asked the defence minister to first produce the 30 missing persons and then an in-camera briefing would be held in the judge’s chamber.

Opinion

Who bears the cost?

Who bears the cost?

This small window of low inflation should compel a rethink of how the authorities and employers understand the average household’s

Editorial

Internet restrictions
23 Dec, 2024

Internet restrictions

JUST how much longer does the government plan on throttling the internet is a question up in the air right now....
Bangladesh reset
23 Dec, 2024

Bangladesh reset

THE vibes were positive during Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif’s recent meeting with Bangladesh interim leader Dr...
Leaving home
23 Dec, 2024

Leaving home

FROM asylum seekers to economic migrants, the continuing exodus from Pakistan shows mass disillusionment with the...
Military convictions
Updated 22 Dec, 2024

Military convictions

Pakistan’s democracy, still finding its feet, cannot afford such compromises on core democratic values.
Need for talks
22 Dec, 2024

Need for talks

FOR a long time now, the country has been in the grip of relentless political uncertainty, featuring the...
Vulnerable vaccinators
22 Dec, 2024

Vulnerable vaccinators

THE campaign to eradicate polio from Pakistan cannot succeed unless the safety of vaccinators and security personnel...