ISLAMABAD: The prayer of former president Gen (retd) Pervez Musharraf was heard finally as Supreme Court formally fixed his review petition, along with a request to stay the trial on treason charges against him, for next week.

Headed by Chief Justice Tassaduq Hussain Jillani, a 14-judge full court will commence proceedings from Jan 28. Except for Justice Ejaz Afzal Khan and Justice Mohammad Athar Saeed, all available judges will sit on the larger bench to decide the matter.

On Dec 23, 2013, Musharraf had filed a petition after a delay of over four years, seeking review of the landmark July 31, 2009, verdict denouncing the successive military takeovers of the last four decades, their endorsement by the superior judiciary after declaring Musharraf’s second coup of Nov 3, 2007, unconstitutional by proclaiming emergency and cancelling appointment of over 100 superior court judges.

The review petition was, however, returned by the court office by raising eight objections, against which an appeal was preferred.

On Jan 8, Justice Anwar Zaheer Jamali had ordered the court office to place the appeal along with the review petition of Musharraf before a Supreme Court bench to decide about the objections as well as the request of revisiting the July 31 judgment.

In his petition, filed through Advocate Mohammad Ibrahim Satti, the petitioner had pleaded that if stay was not granted and review was not decided at an early date, the case of the petitioner (Musharraf) would be prejudiced and he may entail penalty under the high treason act which will be an irreparable loss.

The High Treason (Punishment) Act 1973 envisaged only death penalty or imprisonment for life for high treason as defined in Article 6 of the Constitution.

The review petition had pleaded that Musharraf was facing trial before the special court for the offence of high treason on the basis of July 31, 2009, verdict of the apex court, also accepting for the first time that the constitutional deviation by clamping Nov 3, 2007, emergency was for public good and to get rid of former Chief Justice Iftikhar Mohammad Chaudhry as well as some judges since their removal had then become impossible under the normal legal procedures.

The review petition argued that former elected Prime Minister Shaukat Aziz had recommended taking extra- constitutional measures of proclaiming Nov 3 emergency.

Opinion

Who bears the cost?

Who bears the cost?

This small window of low inflation should compel a rethink of how the authorities and employers understand the average household’s

Editorial

Internet restrictions
Updated 23 Dec, 2024

Internet restrictions

Notion that Pakistan enjoys unprecedented freedom of expression difficult to reconcile with the reality of restrictions.
Bangladesh reset
23 Dec, 2024

Bangladesh reset

THE vibes were positive during Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif’s recent meeting with Bangladesh interim leader Dr...
Leaving home
23 Dec, 2024

Leaving home

FROM asylum seekers to economic migrants, the continuing exodus from Pakistan shows mass disillusionment with the...
Military convictions
Updated 22 Dec, 2024

Military convictions

Pakistan’s democracy, still finding its feet, cannot afford such compromises on core democratic values.
Need for talks
22 Dec, 2024

Need for talks

FOR a long time now, the country has been in the grip of relentless political uncertainty, featuring the...
Vulnerable vaccinators
22 Dec, 2024

Vulnerable vaccinators

THE campaign to eradicate polio from Pakistan cannot succeed unless the safety of vaccinators and security personnel...