SOCHI (Russia): Each time an Olympics approaches, the ideal is articulated once more: the true spirit of the games, those who oversee them say, brings humanity together to promote amity and athletic excellence.

It is most certainly not a place for the affairs of nations and vested interests to play out on a global stage.

“Olympics is not about politics. It’s about the sport, fair play and humanity,” Dmitry Chernyshenko, head of the Sochi organising committee, said last week, echoing his predecessors.

The new president of the International Olympic Committee, Germany’s Thomas Bach, was more nuanced, saying before the games began that his organisation must be “politically neutral without being apolitical.’’

And yet, in Sochi this week, politics percolate everywhere, which is not unusual. It has lurked at the margins of Olympic Games going back at least to the moment in 1936 in Berlin when German Chancellor Adolf Hitler, a white supremacist, watched Jesse Owens, a black American, take gold in the 100-metre sprint.

The Olympics, you might say, are the planet’s most political apolitical event.

Consider Friday night’s appearance by Russian President Vladimir Putin at the US Olympic Committee’s USA House and wearing a Team USA pin on his lapel, no less. It was entirely good-natured, but it couldn’t have been more political.

On the surface, it was an Olympics host leader cheerfully glad-handing guests. But below the bonhomie, it was hard not to conjure a stew of words and memories that evoked old suspicions: Cold War, “We will bury you,” spies, the Eastern Bloc, Nato, detente, nuclear proliferation. And new ones, too: Edward Snowden.

Putin is only the most obvious example. To watch the Olympics — and to look beyond the marvelous athletic performances and the uncounted, often unexpected friendships it helps build — is to see a human anthill of scripts and vested interests playing themselves out.

“There is this absolute insistence that there be no politics. I think they have to say that,” says Curt Hamakawa, a US Olympic Committee official for 16 years.

“But the fact of the matter is, that is not true. And it comes across as being a bit hypocritical,” says Hamakawa. “Government and sport is pretty much intertwined for most countries. I don’t know that they can escape from it.’’

Several Olympics of the past half century have been particularly politically charged. Tokyo’s hosting of the 1964 Summer Games showcased Japan’s return to the global stage after World War II.

And of course there were the boycott years — 1976, 1980 and 1984 — when entire nations (including the US and the Soviet Union) stayed away because rivals either were there or were hosting.

Front and centre this time around is the disconnect between Russia’s strict attitude toward gays and voices around the world that take issue with its approach. Despite some predictions that gay athletes or their supporters might turn Olympic spectacles into political ones, it hadn’t happened as of Saturday.

Then there are the leaders who stay away — and sometimes make comments about the games from afar. President Barack Obama’s decision not to come, for one, has been speculated about by many. Was it because of scheduling, geopolitics, or both?

At the games, Olympic politics can take many forms. There is the fact that Taiwan must compete as “Chinese Taipei” because of a six-decade schism with mainland China. There is Ukraine, gripped with unrest as it tries to secure an Olympic-city bid for 2022.

“The Olympic sports, the Olympics ideas, the Olympic movement, this is above any politics and Ukraine will resolve all of its political problems and all of its political issues,” its acting deputy prime minister, Oleksandr Vilkul, said in Sochi a few days ago.

In the end, politics exists for a reason: The alternative, war, is far worse. Politics is humanity’s attempt to work things out and keep all interests satisfied. And that is precisely what happens at an Olympic Games — sometimes with more success, sometimes with less, always trying.

Just ask the Russian and Georgian air-pistol medalists who hugged on the podium during the 2008 Beijing Games while their countries fought.

“Sports should live its own life and politics should live its own life,” said Velieri Bobrov of Sochi, a spectator in Olympic Park. —AP

Opinion

Who bears the cost?

Who bears the cost?

This small window of low inflation should compel a rethink of how the authorities and employers understand the average household’s

Editorial

Internet restrictions
Updated 23 Dec, 2024

Internet restrictions

Notion that Pakistan enjoys unprecedented freedom of expression difficult to reconcile with the reality of restrictions.
Bangladesh reset
23 Dec, 2024

Bangladesh reset

THE vibes were positive during Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif’s recent meeting with Bangladesh interim leader Dr...
Leaving home
23 Dec, 2024

Leaving home

FROM asylum seekers to economic migrants, the continuing exodus from Pakistan shows mass disillusionment with the...
Military convictions
Updated 22 Dec, 2024

Military convictions

Pakistan’s democracy, still finding its feet, cannot afford such compromises on core democratic values.
Need for talks
22 Dec, 2024

Need for talks

FOR a long time now, the country has been in the grip of relentless political uncertainty, featuring the...
Vulnerable vaccinators
22 Dec, 2024

Vulnerable vaccinators

THE campaign to eradicate polio from Pakistan cannot succeed unless the safety of vaccinators and security personnel...