Military intervention

Published February 27, 2014

SINCE the 2008 elections, parliamentary democracy in the country has been strengthened by politicians who have stood united against any hint of extra-constitutional intervention. Though the political class can be accused of indecisiveness when it comes to taking hard decisions, years of military dictatorship and army interference in civilian affairs have taught it why democratic values need to be cherished. It is saddening then that MQM chief Altaf Hussain should call for army intervention in the event of the government not backing the military’s fight against the Pakistani Taliban. True, the outlawed group has committed horrendous acts of terror across the country. Thousands, including soldiers and ordinary civilians, have died in the bloodbath. Schools, mosques, markets and security installations have all been targeted, and there can be no divergence from the view that militancy in the country must be uprooted, and its perpetrators brought to justice. But surely, it is the elected representatives of the people who should lead the way and make decisions which the army must obey. It is a fact that no strategy against the militants would be complete without input from the military, but in any democracy worth its salt, the final decision rests with those in parliament.

Mr Hussain’s own party has, more than once, been at the receiving end of operations conducted by both the military and civilian law enforcers. So it is ironical that he should call for military intervention. The argument he has used, that the country is more important than democracy, cannot be sustained in the light of history. Military regimes have weakened rather than strengthened the country. One dictator abrogated an earlier constitution. Two others mauled the current one beyond recognition, and it took approximately a decade in each case before the elected assemblies were able to recast the basic law in its original mould. Mr Hussain’s party has sizeable representation in the national and provincial assemblies, and such utterances send out the wrong message to anti-constitutional forces lurking in the wings. It is the Taliban who want to see the Constitution jettisoned; mature political parties should not be seen to even imply this, even if their argument is different.

Opinion

Editorial

What now?
20 Sep, 2024

What now?

Govt's actions could turn the reserved seats verdict into a major clash between institutions. It is a risky and unfortunate escalation.
IHK election farce
20 Sep, 2024

IHK election farce

WHILE India will be keen to trumpet the holding of elections in held Kashmir as a return to ‘normalcy’, things...
Donating organs
20 Sep, 2024

Donating organs

CERTAIN philanthropic practices require a more scientific temperament than ours to flourish. Deceased organ donation...
Lingering concerns
19 Sep, 2024

Lingering concerns

Embarrassed after failing to muster numbers during the high-stakes drama that played out all weekend, the govt will need time to regroup.
Pager explosions
Updated 19 Sep, 2024

Pager explosions

This dangerous brinkmanship is likely to drag the region — and the global economy — into a vortex of violence and instability.
Losing to China
19 Sep, 2024

Losing to China

AT a time when they should have stepped up, a sense of complacency seemed to have descended on the Pakistan hockey...