Russia vetoes UN resolution on Crimea; China abstains

Published March 16, 2014
A vote regarding the Ukrainian crisis is taken at the UN Security Council in New York March 15, 2014. – Reuters Photo
A vote regarding the Ukrainian crisis is taken at the UN Security Council in New York March 15, 2014. – Reuters Photo

UNITED NATIONS: Russia vetoed a Western-backed resolution condemning the Crimea referendum at a UN Security Council emergency vote Saturday, but China abstained, isolating Moscow further on the Ukraine crisis.

The draft resolution, which says Sunday's referendum would have no validity, got 13 votes in the 15-member council. But it was rejected when permanent member Russia exercised its veto.

The resolution declares that the referendum on whether the semi-autonomous region should come under Kremlin rule “cannot form the basis for any alteration of the status of Crimea.”

China often backs Russia at the council, especially on Syria-related votes, and Western powers presented its abstention as the best possible outcome from the seventh UN emergency session since the crisis began.

“Russia, isolated, alone and wrong, blocked the resolution's passage,” US ambassador Samantha Power told the council.

“This is a sad and remarkable moment.”

US national security advisers assembled at the White House to discuss Ukraine. President Barack Obama was not there but was being briefed, a senior US official said.

“Russia totally isolated at UNSC. 13 vote for Resolution. Even China abstains. Russia alone in refusing to affirm sovereignty of #Ukraine,” US Deputy National Security Adviser Ben Rhodes tweeted.

It came as Ukraine accused Russian forces of invading a southeastern region of the country that neighbors Crimea.

Thanking the UN for its efforts, Kiev warned the world the situation on the ground had suddenly got worse.

“This is something which changes the situation dramatically,” Ukraine's ambassador to the UN, Yuriy Sergeyev, told reporters.

The United States was looking into the reports but would see any new Russian troop movement in south Ukraine as an “outrageous escalation,” Power warned.

“For something additional, even more escalatory to have occurred would be flying in the face of everything you have heard here today,” she said.

The Security Council session, which lasted more than an hour, degenerated into the usual recriminations between Western powers and Ukraine stacked up in one corner, and Russia in the other.

Russia's veto had been certain after last-ditch talks between US Secretary of State John Kerry and his Russian counterpart Sergei Lavrov broke down in London on Friday.

“It is a secret to no one that the Russian Federation will vote against the resolution,” Russian Ambassador Vitaly Churkin told the council before the vote.

He defended Crimea's referendum as necessary to fill the “legal vacuum” that arose “as a result of an unconstitutional coup d'etat in Ukraine.”

He later singled out Ukraine for “going beyond” permissible rhetoric, France for failing to mention alleged killings in Russian-speaking Ukraine and the United States for its “PR.”

“Madam Power spoke of truth. Was Washington telling its truth about its role in the development of the crisis?” he thundered.

“Why are you negating the right of the people in Crimea to express their will in the referendum tomorrow?”


'A sad day'


France, like Ukraine, harkened back to the days of the Cold War.

French Ambassador Gerard Araud told reporters that the impending annexation of Crimea was “totally unacceptable.” “It's a sad day, really, because we have the impression to go back 30 or 40 years,” he added.

British Ambassador Mark Lyall Grant demanded Russia work to find a peaceful solution and “take notice of its isolation.” “If Russia fails to respond to Ukraine's outstretched hand, it will lead to further escalation of tension in the region and further consequences for Russia,” he said.

The United States had drafted the resolution in very measured terms so that it could be accepted by Beijing.

Chinese Ambassador Liu Jieyi justified Beijing's abstention by saying that passing a resolution at this moment would “only result in confrontation and further complicate the situation.”

“China has always been fair and objective. We will continue to mediate and promote dialogue so as to play a constructive role in seeking a political solution to the crisis,” he said.

Beijing has long defended the need to respect territorial integrity and does not back interference in the internal affairs of other countries.

When the Security Council ruled on a similar international crisis, between Russia and Georgia in 2008, Beijing abstained.

Opinion

Editorial

Trump 2.0
Updated 07 Nov, 2024

Trump 2.0

It remains to be seen how his promises to bring ‘peace’ to Middle East reconcile with his blatantly pro-Israel bias.
Fait accompli
07 Nov, 2024

Fait accompli

A SLEW of secretively conceived and hastily enacted legislation has achieved its intended result: the powers of the...
IPP contracts
07 Nov, 2024

IPP contracts

THE government expects the ongoing ‘negotiations’ with power producers aimed at revising the terms of sovereign...
Rushed legislation
Updated 06 Nov, 2024

Rushed legislation

For all its stress on "supremacy of parliament", the ruling coalition has wasted no opportunity to reiterate where its allegiances truly lie.
Jail reform policy
06 Nov, 2024

Jail reform policy

THE state is making a fresh attempt to improve conditions in Pakistan’s penitentiaries by developing a national...
BISP overhaul
06 Nov, 2024

BISP overhaul

IT has emerged that the spouses of over 28,500 Sindh government employees have been illicitly benefiting from BISP....