IHC returns Musharraf’s petition

Published March 20, 2014
Islamabad High Court. — File photo
Islamabad High Court. — File photo

ISLAMABAD: The registrar office of the Islamabad High Court (IHC) on Wednesday returned the petition of former president retired General Pervez Musharraf he had filed before the court on Tuesday seeking his trial in high treason case under Army Act.

The registrar office held that since the special court, seized with his high treason trial, has rejected the identical petition for transferring the high treason case to the military court therefore being the appellate forum such petition could only be filed in the Supreme Court.

Three members bench of the special court headed by Justice Faisal Arab of Sindh High Court (SHC) on February 21, 2014 rejected the plea for transferring the high treason case to the military court.

In it ruling, the special court said: “the offences under the High Treason (Punishment) Act, 1973 are exclusively triable by the special court established under the Criminal Law Amendment (Special Court) Act, 1976 as its Section 3 (2) ousts the jurisdiction of all other courts.”

It may be mentioned that prior to the commencement of special court’s proceedings on December 23, 2014 IHC single bench had already dismissed the same petition.

IHC Justice Riaz Ahmed Khan had held that the special court had taken cognizance of the matter and that Article 6 of the constitution under which the federal government had filed the complaint against Musharraf has overriding effect on the Pakistan Army Act, 1952 hence the trial could not be transferred to the military court.

In the petition, Gen Musharraf through his lawyers contended that he imposed the emergency on November 3, 2007 as Chief of Army Staff therefore the military court was the relevant forum for his trial for any alleged offence.

The petition said three retired military officers -- Gen Khalid Muneer Khan, Gen Muzaffar Afzal and Gen Khalid Zaheer -- who retired between 2004 and 2008 from the army and now facing prosecution under the National Accountability Bureau (NAB), had their cases transferred to the army court under Section 7 of the Pakistan Army Act.

It further said that the government was trying to deprive Gen Musharraf of his fundamental right to a fair trial as enshrined in Article 10-A and Article 25 of the constitution by not transferring his case to the military court.

Opinion

Editorial

Tax amendments
Updated 20 Dec, 2024

Tax amendments

Bureaucracy gimmicks have not produced results, will not do so in the future.
Cricket breakthrough
20 Dec, 2024

Cricket breakthrough

IT had been made clear to Pakistan that a Champions Trophy without India was not even a distant possibility, even if...
Troubled waters
20 Dec, 2024

Troubled waters

LURCHING from one crisis to the next, the Pakistani state has been consistent in failing its vulnerable citizens....
Madressah oversight
Updated 19 Dec, 2024

Madressah oversight

Bill should be reconsidered and Directorate General of Religious Education, formed to oversee seminaries, should not be rolled back.
Kurram’s misery
Updated 19 Dec, 2024

Kurram’s misery

The state must recognise that allowing such hardship to continue undermines its basic duty to protect citizens’ well-being.
Hiking gas rates
19 Dec, 2024

Hiking gas rates

IMPLEMENTATION of a new Ogra recommendation to increase the gas prices by an average 8.7pc or Rs142.45 per mmBtu in...