ISLAMABAD: The sister of a missing Baloch student leader filed a petition in the Supreme Court on Tuesday, challenging the Balochistan High Court (BHC)’s order to reject her earlier petition seeking recovery of her brother.

The petition of Farzana Majeed was dismissed by the BHC on Oct 22 last year on the ground that her brother Zakir Majeed had not been kidnapped but had intentionally disappeared to avoid facing legal action. He was booked in a case registered at the Khuzdar police station in Nov 2008 and disappeared after being granted bail by a court in Oct 2009.

On the other hand, Farzana Majeed had pleaded that the allegations against her brother were false and there was ample evidence to prove that he had been picked up by intelligence agencies without disclosing allegations against him.

Farzana Majeed was one of the participants of the 3,500-km long march from Quetta to Islamabad spearheaded by Mama Qadeer Baloch to highlight the plight of missing persons of Balochistan. Earlier she had been taking part in demonstrations outside the Quetta Press Club.

On Tuesday, she told reporters that her brother should be tried in a court if he had committed a crime.

Mama Qadeer said he had no hope of justice from the judiciary but still he had come there in the hope of justice.

He said he was planning to launch a march to Geneva -- a city which hosts several international organisations, including the United Nations -- on the pattern of their Quetta-Islamabad march to protest against alleged highhandedness and injustices being meted out to the Baloch people.

A Supreme Court bench headed by Justice Nasir-ul-Mulk is seized with a case relating to Zakir Majeed but the Balochistan government had informed it in a hearing about the BHC order.

In the petition filed through her special attorney Shah Khalid, Farzana Majeed has requested the Supreme Court to set aside the high court’s order. She has named the interior ministry, the commandants of Inter Services Intelligence, Military Intelligence, Federal Investigation Unit, Kulli Camp in Quetta, Frontier Corps in Kalat and Mastung, DPO of Mastung and home secretary of Balochistan as respondents.

She has argued in the petition that her earlier petition was dismissed because she was not aware of latest developments related to the case and was not represented by a counsel in the high court.

The petition says that the BHC order is contrary to the facts, law and justice and therefore liable to be overturned because the court has made adverse observations in the absence of Zakir Majeed.

It says that the rights of life, liberty and fair trial are basic, human and fundamental rights and the courts are bound to inquire about the whereabouts of missing persons.

Opinion

Editorial

Islamabad march
Updated 27 Nov, 2024

Islamabad march

WITH emotions running high, chaos closes in. As these words were being written, rumours and speculation were all...
Policing the internet
27 Nov, 2024

Policing the internet

IT is chilling to witness how Pakistan — a nation that embraced the freedoms of modern democracy, and the tech ...
Correcting sports priorities
27 Nov, 2024

Correcting sports priorities

IT has been a lingering battle that has cast a shadow over sports in Pakistan: who are the national sports...
Kurram ceasefire
Updated 26 Nov, 2024

Kurram ceasefire

DESPITE efforts by the KP government to bring about a ceasefire in Kurram tribal district, the bloodletting has...
Hollow victory
26 Nov, 2024

Hollow victory

THE conclusion of COP29 in Baku has left developing nations — struggling with the mounting costs of climate...
Infrastructure schemes
26 Nov, 2024

Infrastructure schemes

THE government’s decision to finance priority PSDP schemes on a three-year rolling basis is a significant step...