PARIS: French economist Thomas Piketty hit back Saturday at criticism by the Financial Times of his best-selling book on income inequality, telling AFP the newspaper was being “ridiculous”.

The FT claimed Friday there was little evidence in the 43-year-old’s original sources to underpin his argument in “Capital in the Twenty-First Century” that an increasing share of total wealth is in the hands of the richest.

But Piketty said: “The FT is being ridiculous because all of its contemporaries recognise that the biggest fortunes have grown faster.

“The data that we have on these fortunes is imperfect but data for other things such as tax declarations on estates is more reliable.”

He worked “completely transparently” and posted all his data online, he added.

The FT said in its report that once it had “cleaned up and simplified the data, the European numbers do not show any tendency towards rising wealth inequality after 1970”.

The English-language version of Piketty’s book topped the Amazon bestseller list in the United States and has sparked a political debate about the gap between rich and poor.—AFP

Published in Dawn, May 25th, 2014

Opinion

Editorial

Kurram peace deal
03 Jan, 2025

Kurram peace deal

It is the state’s responsibility to ensure that people of all sects can travel to and from the district without fear.
Pension reform
03 Jan, 2025

Pension reform

THE federal government has finally implemented several parametric reforms introduced in the last two budgets to...
The Indian hand
03 Jan, 2025

The Indian hand

OFFICIALS of the Modi regime were operating under a rather warped sense of reality, playing out Bollywood fantasies...
Economic plan
Updated 02 Jan, 2025

Economic plan

Absence of policy reforms allows the bureaucracy a lot of space to wriggle out of responsibility.
On life support
02 Jan, 2025

On life support

PAKISTAN stands at a precarious crossroads as we embark on a new year. Pildat’s Quality of Democracy report has...
Harsh sentence
02 Jan, 2025

Harsh sentence

USING lawfare to swiftly get rid of political opponents makes a mockery of the legal system, especially when ...